BACKGROUND:Tracheal suctioning costs are higher with a closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) than with an open system (OTSS), due to the need for complete daily change as recommended by the manufacturer. However, is it necessary to change the closed system daily? OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tracheal suctioning costs and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using closed system without daily change vs OTSS. DESIGN: Prospective and randomised study. SETTING: An Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to CTSS without daily change or OTSS. We used a CTSS that allowed partial or complete change. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both groups of patients (236 with CTSS and 221 with OTSS) in gender, age, diagnosis, APACHE-II score, mortality, number of aspirations per day, percentage of patients who developed VAP (13.9 vs 14.1%) or the number of ventilator-associated pneumonia per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation (14.1 vs 14.6). There were not significant differences in tracheal suctioning costs per patient/day between CTSS vs OTSS (2.3+/-3.7 vs 2.4+/-0.5 Euros; p=0.96); however, when length of mechanical ventilation was lower than 4 days, the cost was higher with CTSS than with OTSS (7.2+/-4.7 vs 1.9+/-0.6 Euros; p<0.001); and when length of mechanical ventilation was higher than 4days, the cost was lower with CTSS than with OTSS (1.6+/-2.8 vs 2.5+/-0.5 Euros; p<0.001). CONCLUSION:CTSS without daily change is the optimal option for patients needing tracheal suction longer than 4 days.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Tracheal suctioning costs are higher with a closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) than with an open system (OTSS), due to the need for complete daily change as recommended by the manufacturer. However, is it necessary to change the closed system daily? OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tracheal suctioning costs and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using closed system without daily change vs OTSS. DESIGN: Prospective and randomised study. SETTING: An Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomly assigned to CTSS without daily change or OTSS. We used a CTSS that allowed partial or complete change. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both groups of patients (236 with CTSS and 221 with OTSS) in gender, age, diagnosis, APACHE-II score, mortality, number of aspirations per day, percentage of patients who developed VAP (13.9 vs 14.1%) or the number of ventilator-associated pneumonia per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation (14.1 vs 14.6). There were not significant differences in tracheal suctioning costs per patient/day between CTSS vs OTSS (2.3+/-3.7 vs 2.4+/-0.5 Euros; p=0.96); however, when length of mechanical ventilation was lower than 4 days, the cost was higher with CTSS than with OTSS (7.2+/-4.7 vs 1.9+/-0.6 Euros; p<0.001); and when length of mechanical ventilation was higher than 4days, the cost was lower with CTSS than with OTSS (1.6+/-2.8 vs 2.5+/-0.5 Euros; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CTSS without daily change is the optimal option for patients needing tracheal suction longer than 4 days.
Authors: S A Deppe; J W Kelly; L L Thoi; J H Chudy; R N Longfield; J P Ducey; C L Truwit; M R Antopol Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1990-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tom J Overend; Cathy M Anderson; Dina Brooks; Lisa Cicutto; Michael Keim; Debra McAuslan; Mika Nonoyama Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: L Lorente; M Lecuona; A Jiménez; S Palmero; E Pastor; N Lafuente; M J Ramos; M L Mora; A Sierra Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 3.267