Literature DB >> 9279225

Mechanical ventilation with or without daily changes of in-line suction catheters.

M H Kollef1, D Prentice, S D Shapiro, V J Fraser, P Silver, E Trovillion, P Weilitz, B von Harz, R St John.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of not routinely changing in-line suction catheters for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either no routine in-line suction catheter changes (n = 258) or in-line suction catheter changes every 24 h (n = 263). The main outcome measure was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Other outcomes evaluated included hospital mortality, acquired organ system derangements, duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of intensive care and hospital stay, and the cost for in-line suction catheters. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was seen in 38 patients (14.7%) receiving no routine in-line suction catheter changes and in 39 patients (14.8%) receiving in-line suction catheter changes every 24 h (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.50). No statistically significant differences for hospital mortality, lengths of stay, the number of acquired organ system derangements, death in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, or mortality directly attributed to ventilator-associated pneumonia were found between the two treatment groups. Patients receiving in-line suction catheter changes every 24 h had 1,224 catheter changes costing a total of $11,016; patients receiving no routine in-line suction catheter changes had a total of 93 catheter changes costing $837. Our findings suggest that the elimination of routine in-line suction catheter changes is safe and can reduce the costs associated with providing mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9279225     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9612083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  18 in total

1.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Steven M Koenig; Jonathon D Truwit
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Endotracheal suctioning, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and costs: open or closed issue?

Authors:  Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Endotracheal tube management during mechanical ventilation: less is more!

Authors:  Robert M Kacmarek; Gianluigi Li Bassi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Impact of the suctioning system (open vs. closed) on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Tim Eckmanns; Tobias Welte; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Impact of closed versus open tracheal suctioning systems for mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kuriyama; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Jun Fujinaga; Tadaaki Takada
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; María Lecuona; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora; Antonio Sierra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Noninvasive ventilation for patients near the end of life: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  William J Ehlenbach; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.

Authors:  E Meyer; M Schuhmacher; W Ebner; M Dettenkofer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Ventilator associated pneumonia and infection control.

Authors:  Emine Alp; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 10.  Clinical review: non-antibiotic strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Ricard Ferrer; Antonio Artigas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.