Literature DB >> 12590330

Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheter surface.

C C Freytag1, F L Thies, W König, T Welte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microorganisms become attracted to polymer surfaces for a number of reasons including positive charge of biomaterial or concentration of nutrients on the biomaterial surface. Many bacteria additionally possess specific receptors for the interaction with extracellular host protein components that adhere on the biomaterial surface. Several authors suggest that application of closed in-line polypropylene suction catheters (CISC) in intubated patients for more than 24 h is safe and can reduce the costs associated with mechanical ventilation. Therefore, we evaluated the possible role of prolonged application of CISC to cause enhanced colonization of both the biomaterial and the lower respiratory tract.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective, randomized study included 23 mechanically ventilated patients. The CISC tips, adjacent segments and tracheobronchial aspirates of each patient were examined for microbial growth.
RESULTS: Application for 72 h significantly enhanced the microbial growth on the CISC tips and on the adjacent catheter segment. Usage for 3 days led to a significant increase in colonization in the lower respiratory tract.
CONCLUSION: Normal saline instillation in conjunction with endotracheal suctioning may lead to a dispersion of microorganisms into the lower respiratory tract. More effective self-cleaning mechanisms are necessary to decontaminate the CISC surface after suctioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590330     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-002-3066-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  5 in total

1.  Endotracheal suctioning, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and costs: open or closed issue?

Authors:  Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Impact of the suctioning system (open vs. closed) on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Tim Eckmanns; Tobias Welte; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Mv Pravin Charles; Arunava Kali; Joshy M Easow; Noyal Maria Joseph; M Ravishankar; Srirangaraj Srinivasan; Shailesh Kumar; Sivaraman Umadevi
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-08-31

4.  Updating the Evidence: Suctioning Practices of Physiotherapists in Ontario.

Authors:  Samantha Triemstra; Haiyun Liang; Megan Gooder; Nicole Livings; Abbigale Spencer; Lindsay Beavers; Dina Brooks; Erin Miller
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.

Authors:  E Meyer; M Schuhmacher; W Ebner; M Dettenkofer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.