Literature DB >> 17683427

Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.

Russell Lande1.   

Abstract

Wright's adaptive topography describes gene frequency evolution as a maximization of mean fitness in a constant environment. I extended this to a fluctuating environment by unifying theories of stochastic demography and fluctuating selection, assuming small or moderate fluctuations in demographic rates with a stationary distribution, and weak selection among the types. The demography of a large population, composed of haploid genotypes at a single locus or normally distributed phenotypes, can then be approximated as a diffusion process and transformed to produce the dynamics of population size, N, and gene frequency, p, or mean phenotype, . The expected evolution of p or is a product of genetic variability and the gradient of the long-run growth rate of the population, , with respect to p or . This shows that the expected evolution maximizes , the mean Malthusian fitness in the average environment minus half the environmental variance in population growth rate. Thus, as a function of p or represents an adaptive topography that, despite environmental fluctuations, does not change with time. The haploid model is dominated by environmental stochasticity, so the expected maximization is not realized. Different constraints on quantitative genetic variability, and stabilizing selection in the average environment, allow evolution of the mean phenotype to undergo a stochastic maximization of . Although the expected evolution maximizes the long-run growth rate of the population, for a genotype or phenotype the long-run growth rate is not a valid measure of fitness in a fluctuating environment. The haploid and quantitative character models both reveal that the expected relative fitness of a type is its Malthusian fitness in the average environment minus the environmental covariance between its growth rate and that of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683427     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00170.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  32 in total

1.  An evolutionary maximum principle for density-dependent population dynamics in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  From stochastic environments to life histories and back.

Authors:  Shripad Tuljapurkar; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The fixation probability of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Z Patwa; L M Wahl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Measuring selective constraint on fertility in human life histories.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Riding across the selection landscape: fitness consequences of annual variation in reproductive characteristics.

Authors:  Raymond L Tremblay; James D Ackerman; Maria-Eglée Pérez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Reproductive value and fluctuating selection in an age-structured population.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Russell Lande; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Intragenomic bet-hedging.

Authors:  Jostein Starrfelt
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Maintenance of Quantitative Genetic Variance Under Partial Self-Fertilization, with Implications for Evolution of Selfing.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Emmanuelle Porcher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Adaptive Bet-Hedging Revisited: Considerations of Risk and Time Horizon.

Authors:  Omri Tal; Tat Dat Tran
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Evolution with stochastic fitness and stochastic migration.

Authors:  Sean H Rice; Anthony Papadopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.