Literature DB >> 17683429

The G matrix under fluctuating correlational mutation and selection.

Liam J Revell1.   

Abstract

Theoretical quantitative genetics provides a framework for reconstructing past selection and predicting future patterns of phenotypic differentiation. However, the usefulness of the equations of quantitative genetics for evolutionary inference relies on the evolutionary stability of the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G matrix). A fruitful new approach for exploring the evolutionary dynamics of G involves the use of individual-based computer simulations. Previous studies have focused on the evolution of the eigenstructure of G. An alternative approach employed in this paper uses the multivariate response-to-selection equation to evaluate the stability of G. In this approach, I measure similarity by the correlation between response-to-selection vectors due to random selection gradients. I analyze the dynamics of G under several conditions of correlational mutation and selection. As found in a previous study, the eigenstructure of G is stabilized by correlational mutation and selection. However, over broad conditions, instability of G did not result in a decreased consistency of the response to selection. I also analyze the stability of G when the correlation coefficients of correlational mutation and selection and the effective population size change through time. To my knowledge, no prior study has used computer simulations to investigate the stability of G when correlational mutation and selection fluctuate. Under these conditions, the eigenstructure of G is unstable under some simulation conditions. Different results are obtained if G matrix stability is assessed by eigenanalysis or by the response to random selection gradients. In this case, the response to selection is most consistent when certain aspects of the eigenstructure of G are least stable and vice versa.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683429     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Evolution of the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix under continuous directional selection on a complex behavioural phenotype.

Authors:  Vincent Careau; Matthew E Wolak; Patrick A Carter; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Directional selection can drive the evolution of modularity in complex traits.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Directional Selection Rather Than Functional Constraints Can Shape the G Matrix in Rapidly Adapting Asexuals.

Authors:  Kevin Gomez; Jason Bertram; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The G-matrix Simulator Family: Software for Research and Teaching.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Reinhard Bürger; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations.

Authors:  J D Aguirre; E Hine; K McGuigan; M W Blows
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Connecting QTLS to the g-matrix of evolutionary quantitative genetics.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Paul A Hohenlohe; Beverley C Ajie; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The effects of stochastic and episodic movement of the optimum on the evolution of the G-matrix and the response of the trait mean to selection.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; R Bürger; S J Arnold; P A Hohenlohe; J C Uyeda
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Conserved G-matrices of morphological and life-history traits among continental and island blue tit populations.

Authors:  B Delahaie; A Charmantier; S Chantepie; D Garant; M Porlier; C Teplitsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Unravelling the architecture of functional variability in wild populations of Polygonum viviparum L.

Authors:  Florian C Boucher; Wilfried Thuiller; Cindy Arnoldi; Cécile H Albert; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.