Literature DB >> 18971453

Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention.

Bertram Schenkluhn1, Christian C Ruff, Klaartje Heinen, Christopher D Chambers.   

Abstract

Everyday visual scenes contain a vast quantity of information, only a fraction of which can guide our behavior. Properties such as the location, color and orientation of stimuli help us extract relevant information from complex scenes (Treisman and Gelade, 1980; Livingstone and Hubel, 1987). But how does the brain coordinate the selection of such different stimulus characteristics? Neuroimaging studies have revealed significant regions of overlapping activity in frontoparietal cortex during attention to locations and features, suggesting a global component to visual selection (Vandenberghe et al., 2001; Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Giesbrecht et al., 2003; Slagter et al., 2007). At the same time, the neural consequences of spatial and feature-based attention differ markedly in early visual areas (Treue and Martinez-Trujillo, 2007), implying that selection may rely on more specific top-down processes. Here we probed the balance between specialized and generalized control by interrupting preparatory attention in the human parietal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found that stimulation of the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) impaired spatial attention only, whereas TMS of the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) disrupted spatial and feature-based attention. The selection of different stimulus characteristics is thus mediated by distinct top-down mechanisms, which can be decoupled by cortical interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971453      PMCID: PMC6671486          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3591-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

1.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas.

Authors:  D Chawla; G Rees; K J Friston
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen; M Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  R J Perry; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Location- or feature-based targeting of peripheral attention.

Authors:  R Vandenberghe; D R Gitelman; T B Parrish; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; V Walsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions.

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Matthew Brett
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.342

View more
  26 in total

1.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  How neuroscience can inform the study of individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.353

5.  The role of the left posterior parietal lobule in top-down modulation on space-based attention: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Lin Chen; Ke Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Differences in theta coherence between spatial and nonspatial attention using intracranial electroencephalographic signals in humans.

Authors:  Young Min Park; Jinsick Park; Joon Hyun Baek; Sun I Kim; In Young Kim; Joong Koo Kang; Dong Pyo Jang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Michiko Sakaki; Ruth Cheng; Ricardo Velasco; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Control of spatial and feature-based attention in frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Adam S Greenberg; Michael Esterman; Daryl Wilson; John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Predictability of saccadic behaviors is modified by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Chang-Mao Chao; Philip Tseng; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Jia-Han Su; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Novel 'hunting' method using transcranial magnetic stimulation over parietal cortex disrupts visuospatial sensitivity in relation to motor thresholds.

Authors:  R Oliver; O Bjoertomt; J Driver; R Greenwood; J Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.