Literature DB >> 11525335

Location- or feature-based targeting of peripheral attention.

R Vandenberghe1, D R Gitelman, T B Parrish, M M Mesulam.   

Abstract

Using event-related fMRI we determined the differential effects of feature- versus location-based cues for directing peripheral attention. Pairs of same-color targets appeared on the left and on the right. A predictive cue indicated whether the subsequent targeting of attention would be based on location (left versus right) or color (red versus blue). Subjects had to press a button when the relevant pair of targets (in the cued side of space or of the cued color) were identical in shape. The feature-based cue thus also led to a "global" expectancy of targets on either side of space whereas the location-based cue elicited a more "focal" expectancy limited to one side of space. The right inferior parietal lobule was more active when attention was targeted on the basis of location than of color. There was no difference between left-sided or right-sided attention in this region, indicating that it mediated the targeting to both sides of space. These results show that the right inferior parietal cortex plays a relatively selective role in mediating location-based and spatially focal modes of attentional deployment. Its relatively equal activation for leftward and rightward attentional shifts is also consistent with models of right hemispheric dominance of spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11525335     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  26 in total

1.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Preparatory allocation of attention and adjustments in conflict processing.

Authors:  Tracy L Luks; Gregory V Simpson; Corby L Dale; Morgan G Hough
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effect of the number of response alternatives on brain activity in response selection.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Woo; Kyoung-Min Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; John T Serences; Barry Giesbrecht; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Decoding cognitive control in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Yu-Chin Chiu; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interhemisphere differences during tasks involving attention and selection of lateralized stimuli.

Authors:  I N Baranov-Krylov; V T Shuvaev; I E Kanunikov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-10

9.  The role of low-frequency rTMS in the superior parietal cortex during time estimation.

Authors:  Fernanda Manaia; Kaline Rocha; Victor Marinho; Francisco Magalhães; Thomaz Oliveira; Valécia Carvalho; Thalys Araújo; Carla Ayres; Daya Gupta; Bruna Velasques; Pedro Ribeiro; Mauricio Cagy; Victor Hugo Bastos; Silmar Teixeira
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Mechanisms of spatial attention control in frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Christina S Konen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.