Literature DB >> 30648326

Differences in theta coherence between spatial and nonspatial attention using intracranial electroencephalographic signals in humans.

Young Min Park1, Jinsick Park1, Joon Hyun Baek2, Sun I Kim1, In Young Kim1, Joong Koo Kang3, Dong Pyo Jang1.   

Abstract

A number of previous studies revealed the importance of the frontoparietal network for attention and preparatory top-down control. Here, we investigated the theta (7-9 Hz) coherence of the right frontoparietal networks to explore the differences in connectivity changes for the right frontoparietal regions during spatial attention (i.e., attention to a specific location rather than a specific feature) and nonspatial attention (i.e., attention to a specific feature rather than a specific location) tasks. The theta coherence in both tasks was primarily maintained at a preparatory state, decreases after stimulus onset, and recovers to the level of the preparatory state after the response time. However, the theta coherence of the frontoparietal network during spatial attention was immediately maintained after cue-onset, whereas for the case of nonspatial attention, it was immediately decreased after cue-onset. In addition, the connectivity of the right frontoparietal network, including the middle frontal gyrus and superior parietal lobe, were significantly higher for spatial attention rather than for nonspatial attention, suggesting that the dorsal parts of right frontoparietal network are more engaged in spatial-specific attention from the preparatory state. These findings also suggest that these two attention systems involve the use of different regional connectivity patterns, not only in the cognitive state, but in the preparatory state as well.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention network; frontoparietal network; intracranial electroencephalography; nonspatial attention; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30648326      PMCID: PMC6865857          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  62 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Functional specificity of superior parietal mediation of spatial shifting.

Authors:  R Vandenberghe; D R Gitelman; T B Parrish; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Jens Schwarzbach; John T Serences; Robert L Carlson; Michael A Steinmetz; James J Pekar; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Theta-activity in anterior cingulate cortex predicts task rules and their adjustments following errors.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Kevin Johnston; Martin Vinck; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons.

Authors:  Ueli Rutishauser; Ian B Ross; Adam N Mamelak; Erin M Schuman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Disorders of visual attention and the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Parashkev Nachev; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Feature-specific attentional priority signals in human cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Luke Hospadaruk; David C Zhu; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Human retrosplenial cortex displays transient theta phase locking with medial temporal cortex prior to activation during autobiographical memory retrieval.

Authors:  Brett L Foster; Anthony Kaveh; Mohammad Dastjerdi; Kai J Miller; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Bertram Schenkluhn; Christian C Ruff; Klaartje Heinen; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Differences in theta coherence between spatial and nonspatial attention using intracranial electroencephalographic signals in humans.

Authors:  Young Min Park; Jinsick Park; Joon Hyun Baek; Sun I Kim; In Young Kim; Joong Koo Kang; Dong Pyo Jang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Connectivity alterations underlying the breakdown of pseudoneglect: New insights from healthy and pathological aging.

Authors:  Chiara Bagattini; Marco Esposito; Clarissa Ferrari; Veronica Mazza; Debora Brignani
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.702

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.