Literature DB >> 24532703

Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain.

Tae-Ho Lee1, Michiko Sakaki1, Ruth Cheng1, Ricardo Velasco1, Mara Mather2.   

Abstract

The arousal-biased competition model predicts that arousal increases the gain on neural competition between stimuli representations. Thus, the model predicts that arousal simultaneously enhances processing of salient stimuli and impairs processing of relatively less-salient stimuli. We tested this model with a simple dot-probe task. On each trial, participants were simultaneously exposed to one face image as a salient cue stimulus and one place image as a non-salient stimulus. A border around the face cue location further increased its bottom-up saliency. Before these visual stimuli were shown, one of two tones played: one that predicted a shock (increasing arousal) or one that did not. An arousal-by-saliency interaction in category-specific brain regions (fusiform face area for salient faces and parahippocampal place area for non-salient places) indicated that brain activation associated with processing the salient stimulus was enhanced under arousal whereas activation associated with processing the non-salient stimulus was suppressed under arousal. This is the first functional magnetic resonance imaging study to demonstrate that arousal can enhance information processing for prioritized stimuli while simultaneously impairing processing of non-prioritized stimuli. Thus, it goes beyond previous research to show that arousal does not uniformly enhance perceptual processing, but instead does so selectively in ways that optimizes attention to highly salient stimuli.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FFA and PPA; arousal-biased competition; emotion-induced enhancement and impairment; emotional arousal; fear-conditioning; perception and attention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532703      PMCID: PMC4249484          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  75 in total

Review 1.  Ascending visceral regulation of cortical affective information processing.

Authors:  Gary G Berntson; Martin Sarter; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Eye fixations and memory for emotional events.

Authors:  S A Christianson; E F Loftus; H Hoffman; G R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Neural correlates of unconditioned response diminution during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Peter A Bandettini; David C Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Mechanisms of top-down attention.

Authors:  Farhan Baluch; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: an fMRI analysis.

Authors:  P J Lang; M M Bradley; J R Fitzsimmons; B N Cuthbert; J D Scott; B Moulder; V Nangia
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Afferent projections to the rat locus coeruleus demonstrated by retrograde and anterograde tracing with cholera-toxin B subunit and Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin.

Authors:  P H Luppi; G Aston-Jones; H Akaoka; G Chouvet; M Jouvet
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Emotion causes targeted forgetting of established memories.

Authors:  Bryan A Strange; Marijn C W Kroes; Judith E Fan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  37 in total

1.  Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens Prioritized Memories Under Arousal.

Authors:  David V Clewett; Ringo Huang; Rico Velasco; Tae-Ho Lee; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  The Affective Neuroscience of Aging.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Emotional arousal amplifies competitions across goal-relevant representation: A neurocomputational framework.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Taiji Ueno; Allison Ponzio; Carolyn W Harley; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-08

5.  How arousal influences neural competition: What dual competition does not explain.

Authors:  Steven G Greening; Mara Mather
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; David Clewett; Michiko Sakaki; Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 7.  The Locus Coeruleus: Essential for Maintaining Cognitive Function and the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Neural activation during anticipated peer evaluation and laboratory meal intake in overweight girls with and without loss of control eating.

Authors:  Johanna M Jarcho; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Eric E Nelson; Scott G Engel; Anna Vannucci; Sara E Field; Adrienne L Romer; Louise Hannallah; Sheila M Brady; Andrew P Demidowich; Lauren B Shomaker; Amber B Courville; Daniel S Pine; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Low Arousal Positive Emotional Stimuli Attenuate Aberrant Working Memory Processing in Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Lucas S Broster; Shonna L Jenkins; Sarah D Holmes; Gregory A Jicha; Yang Jiang
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.