Literature DB >> 18971342

Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.

Nan Li1, Laura Carrel.   

Abstract

Although most genes on one X chromosome in mammalian females are silenced by X inactivation, some "escape" X inactivation and are expressed from both active and inactive Xs. How these escape genes are transcribed from a largely inactivated chromosome is not fully understood, but underlying genomic sequences are likely involved. We developed a transgene approach to ask whether an escape locus is autonomous or is instead influenced by X chromosome location. Two BACs carrying the mouse Jarid1c gene and adjacent X-inactivated transcripts were randomly integrated into mouse XX embryonic stem cells. Four lines with single-copy, X-linked transgenes were identified, and each was inserted into regions that are normally X-inactivated. As expected for genes that are normally subject to X inactivation, transgene transcripts Tspyl2 and Iqsec2 were X-inactivated. However, allelic expression and RNA/DNA FISH indicate that transgenic Jarid1c escapes X inactivation. Therefore, transgenes at 4 different X locations recapitulate endogenous inactive X expression patterns. We conclude that escape from X inactivation is an intrinsic feature of the Jarid1c locus and functionally delimit this escape domain to the 112-kb maximum overlap of the BACs tested. Additionally, although extensive chromatin differences normally distinguish active and inactive loci, unmodified BACs direct proper inactive X expression patterns, establishing that primary DNA sequence alone, in a chromosome position-independent manner, is sufficient to determine X chromosome inactivation status. This transgene approach will enable further dissection of key elements of escape domains and allow rigorous testing of specific genomic sequences on inactive X expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971342      PMCID: PMC2579377          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807765105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Beta-globin YAC transgenes exhibit uniform expression levels but position effect variegation in mice.

Authors:  R Alami; J M Greally; K Tanimoto; S Hwang; Y Q Feng; J D Engel; S Fiering; E E Bouhassira
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Chromosomal domains and escape from X inactivation: comparative X inactivation analysis in mouse and human.

Authors:  K D Tsuchiya; H F Willard
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  An intrinsic but cell-nonautonomous defect in GATA-1-overexpressing mouse erythroid cells.

Authors:  D Whyatt; F Lindeboom; A Karis; R Ferreira; E Milot; R Hendriks; M de Bruijn; A Langeveld; J Gribnau; F Grosveld; S Philipsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA.

Authors:  E C Lee; D Yu; J Martinez de Velasco; L Tessarollo; D A Swing; D L Court; N A Jenkins; N G Copeland
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  A Functional chromatin domain does not resist X chromosome inactivation: silencing of cLys correlates with methylation of a dual promoter-replication origin.

Authors:  Suyinn Chong; Joanna Kontaraki; Constanze Bonifer; Arthur D Riggs
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Escape from X inactivation.

Authors:  C M Disteche; G N Filippova; K D Tsuchiya
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Comparative sequence and x-inactivation analyses of a domain of escape in human xp11.2 and the conserved segment in mouse.

Authors:  Karen D Tsuchiya; John M Greally; Yajun Yi; Kevin P Noel; Jean-Pierre Truong; Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  S M Gartler; A D Riggs
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  A 178-kb BAC transgene imprints the mouse Gtl2 gene and localizes tissue-specific regulatory elements.

Authors:  Aleksey Yevtodiyenko; Ekaterina Y Steshina; Scott C Farner; John M Levorse; Jennifer V Schmidt
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  CTCFBSDB: a CTCF-binding site database for characterization of vertebrate genomic insulators.

Authors:  Lei Bao; Mi Zhou; Yan Cui
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Nuclear organization and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chow; Edith Heard
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  A novel splicing mutation in the IQSEC2 gene that modulates the phenotype severity in a family with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Irene Madrigal; Maria Isabel Alvarez-Mora; Jordi Rosell; Laia Rodríguez-Revenga; Olof Karlberg; Sascha Sauer; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Montserrat Mila
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Methylation of AR locus does not always reflect X chromosome inactivation state.

Authors:  Sabina I Swierczek; Lucie Piterkova; Jaroslav Jelinek; Neeraj Agarwal; Sue Hammoud; Andrew Wilson; Kimberly Hickman; Charles J Parker; Bradley R Cairns; Bradley Cairns; Josef T Prchal
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Next-generation sequencing in X-linked intellectual disability.

Authors:  Andreas Tzschach; Ute Grasshoff; Stefanie Beck-Woedl; Claudia Dufke; Claudia Bauer; Martin Kehrer; Christina Evers; Ute Moog; Barbara Oehl-Jaschkowitz; Nataliya Di Donato; Robert Maiwald; Christine Jung; Alma Kuechler; Solveig Schulz; Peter Meinecke; Stephanie Spranger; Jürgen Kohlhase; Jörg Seidel; Silke Reif; Manuela Rieger; Angelika Riess; Marc Sturm; Julia Bickmann; Christopher Schroeder; Andreas Dufke; Olaf Riess; Peter Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA.

Authors:  Erik Splinter; Elzo de Wit; Elphège P Nora; Petra Klous; Harmen J G van de Werken; Yun Zhu; Lucas J T Kaaij; Wilfred van Ijcken; Joost Gribnau; Edith Heard; Wouter de Laat
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  X chromosome-wide analyses of genomic DNA methylation states and gene expression in male and female neutrophils.

Authors:  Yukio Yasukochi; Osamu Maruyama; Milind C Mahajan; Carolyn Padden; Ghia M Euskirchen; Vincent Schulz; Hideki Hirakawa; Satoru Kuhara; Xing-Hua Pan; Peter E Newburger; Michael Snyder; Sherman M Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD.

Authors:  Alexandra M Lopes; Sarah E Arnold-Croop; António Amorim; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Heat-induced and spontaneous expression of Hsp70.1Luciferase transgene copies localized on Xp22 in female bovine cells.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lelièvre; Daniel Le Bourhis; Amandine Breton; Hélène Hayes; Jean-Luc Servely; Xavier Vignon
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-22

10.  Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Paul D Soloway; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.