Literature DB >> 12052875

A Functional chromatin domain does not resist X chromosome inactivation: silencing of cLys correlates with methylation of a dual promoter-replication origin.

Suyinn Chong1, Joanna Kontaraki, Constanze Bonifer, Arthur D Riggs.   

Abstract

To investigate the molecular mechanism(s) involved in the propagation and maintenance of X chromosome inactivation (XCI), the 21.4-kb chicken lysozyme (cLys) chromatin domain was inserted into the Hprt locus on the mouse X chromosome. The inserted fragment includes flanking matrix attachment regions (MARs), an origin of bidirectional replication (OBR), and all the cis-regulatory elements required for correct tissue-specific expression of cLys. It also contains a recently identified and widely expressed second gene, cGas41. The cLys domain is known to function as an autonomous unit resistant to chromosomal position effects, as evidenced by numerous transgenic mouse lines showing copy-number-dependent and development-specific expression of cLys in the myeloid lineage. We asked the questions whether this functional chromatin domain was resistant to XCI and whether the X inactivation signal could spread across an extended region of avian DNA. A generally useful method was devised to generate pure populations of macrophages with the transgene either on the active (Xa) or the inactive (Xi) chromosome. We found that (i) cLys and cGas41 are expressed normally from the Xa; (ii) the cLys chromatin domain, even when bracketed by MARs, is not resistant to XCI; (iii) transcription factors are excluded from lysozyme enhancers on the Xi; and (iv) inactivation correlates with methylation of a CpG island that is both an OBR and a promoter of the cGas41 gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052875      PMCID: PMC133922          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4667-4676.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  72 in total

1.  Absence of Z-chromosome inactivation for five genes in male chickens.

Authors:  Y Kuroda; N Arai; M Arita; M Teranishi; T Hori; M Harata; S Mizuno
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Physical and functional association of SU(VAR)3-9 and HDAC1 in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Czermin; G Schotta; B B Hülsmann; A Brehm; P B Becker; G Reuter; A Imhof
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-09-24       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Translating the histone code.

Authors:  T Jenuwein; C D Allis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Quantitative hybridization to genomic DNA fractionated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  T J Leach; R L Glaser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  X-chromosome inactivation: a repeat hypothesis.

Authors:  M F Lyon
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1998

6.  Dissection of the locus control function located on the chicken lysozyme gene domain in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C Bonifer; N Yannoutsos; G Krüger; F Grosveld; A E Sippel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Chromatin domains constitute regulatory units for the control of eukaryotic genes.

Authors:  A E Sippel; G Schäfer; N Faust; H Saueressig; A Hecht; C Bonifer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1993

8.  Transcriptional repression of euchromatic genes by Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 and histone modifiers.

Authors:  K K Hwang; J C Eissenberg; H J Worman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken beta-globin locus.

Authors:  M D Litt; M Simpson; M Gaszner; C D Allis; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Transitions in distinct histone H3 methylation patterns at the heterochromatin domain boundaries.

Authors:  C D Allis; S I Grewal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation.

Authors:  Dominic Ciavatta; Sundeep Kalantry; Terry Magnuson; Oliver Smithies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.

Authors:  Nan Li; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  TM6, a novel nuclear matrix attachment region, enhances its flanking gene expression through influencing their chromatin structure.

Authors:  Lusha Ji; Rui Xu; Longtao Lu; Jiedao Zhang; Guodong Yang; Jinguang Huang; Changai Wu; Chengchao Zheng
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 4.  Dosage compensation and gene expression on the mammalian X chromosome: one plus one does not always equal two.

Authors:  Katie E Prothero; Jill M Stahl; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Targeting of >1.5 Mb of human DNA into the mouse X chromosome reveals presence of cis-acting regulators of epigenetic silencing.

Authors:  Christine Yang; Andrea J McLeod; Allison M Cotton; Charles N de Leeuw; Stéphanie Laprise; Kathleen G Banks; Elizabeth M Simpson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A NF-κB-dependent dual promoter-enhancer initiates the lipopolysaccharide-mediated transcriptional activation of the chicken lysozyme in macrophages.

Authors:  James Witham; Lylia Ouboussad; Pascal F Lefevre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The LPS-induced transcriptional upregulation of the chicken lysozyme locus involves CTCF eviction and noncoding RNA transcription.

Authors:  Pascal Lefevre; James Witham; Claire E Lacroix; Peter N Cockerill; Constanze Bonifer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.