Literature DB >> 11003698

Chromosomal domains and escape from X inactivation: comparative X inactivation analysis in mouse and human.

K D Tsuchiya1, H F Willard.   

Abstract

In females, most genes on the inactive X Chromosome (Chr) are transcriptionally silenced. However, several dozen genes have been identified in human that escape inactivation and are expressed from both the active and inactive X Chrs. Many of the genes that escape inactivation in human are subject to inactivation in mouse, raising questions concerning the mechanisms that govern expression from the inactive X Chr in the two species. In human, the existence of a cluster of genes in Xp11.21-p11.22 that escape inactivation suggests that control of X inactivation occurs at the level of chromosomal domains. In this study, we have isolated, physically mapped, and determined the X inactivation status of a number of the orthologous mouse genes that correspond to this human "escape domain". In contrast to human, only the mouse Smcx gene has been found to escape inactivation in this region thus far, despite a highly conserved physical map between the two species. Sequence analysis and functional characterization of the mouse Smcx promoter did not reveal any obvious unique features that would explain the difference in the behavior of this gene on the inactive X compared with other nearby genes. Possible mechanisms responsible for the differing inactivation status between genes in the escape domain in human Xp11. 21-p11.22 and the corresponding mouse region are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003698     DOI: 10.1007/s003350010175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  16 in total

1.  A Functional chromatin domain does not resist X chromosome inactivation: silencing of cLys correlates with methylation of a dual promoter-replication origin.

Authors:  Suyinn Chong; Joanna Kontaraki; Constanze Bonifer; Arthur D Riggs
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Comparative sequence and x-inactivation analyses of a domain of escape in human xp11.2 and the conserved segment in mouse.

Authors:  Karen D Tsuchiya; John M Greally; Yajun Yi; Kevin P Noel; Jean-Pierre Truong; Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation.

Authors:  Dominic Ciavatta; Sundeep Kalantry; Terry Magnuson; Oliver Smithies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.

Authors:  Nan Li; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles.

Authors:  Elena V Dementyeva; Alexander I Shevchenko; Olga V Anopriyenko; Nina A Mazurok; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  X chromosome dosage and the response to cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  L Christine Turtzo; Chad Siegel; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Global survey of escape from X inactivation by RNA-sequencing in mouse.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Tomas Babak; Jay Shendure; Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Heat-induced and spontaneous expression of Hsp70.1Luciferase transgene copies localized on Xp22 in female bovine cells.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lelièvre; Daniel Le Bourhis; Amandine Breton; Hélène Hayes; Jean-Luc Servely; Xavier Vignon
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-22

9.  SMC1A expression and mechanism of pathogenicity in probands with X-Linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome.

Authors:  Jinglan Liu; Rachel Feldman; Zhe Zhang; Matthew A Deardorff; Eden V Haverfield; Maninder Kaur; Jennifer R Li; Dinah Clark; Antonie D Kline; Darrel J Waggoner; Soma Das; Laird G Jackson; Ian D Krantz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Neural growth hormone implicated in body weight sex differences.

Authors:  Paul J Bonthuis; Emilie F Rissman
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.