Literature DB >> 18956595

MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.

Koray Hekimoglu1, Yucel Ustundag, Abdurrahim Dusak, Zuhal Erdem, Bulent Karademir, Selim Aydemir, Sadi Gundogdu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently developed magnetic resonance (MR) techniques permit fast and correct imaging of the entire biliary tree with a high spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic potential of one of these new MR sequences in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) procedure and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with review of current literatures.
METHODS: A total of 295 patients were enrolled in this study prospectively. Of these, 11 were excluded from the study due to inadequate MRCP image quality and 15 more were excluded due to unsuccessful cannulation during ERCP. Thus, finally 269 patients (124 men and 145 women with a mean age of 57 years; range: 23-92 years) were included. The MRCP procedure was performed before the ERCP in all cases. All MRCP studies were performed with recently developed new MR technique using a heavily T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence. This TSE sequence is currently one of the most widely used multiplanar 3-D MR technique, having a high spatial resolution and fast imaging capacity.
RESULTS: The study participants were classified into four main groups; normal into group I, stone disease into group II, tumor into group III and others into group IV. Group I consisted of 228 patients who had a normal pancreaticobiliary tree on both the MRCP and ERCP examinations. In group II there were 18 patients, for whom the MRCP had a 88.9% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for diagnosing biliary stone disease. Its positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rates were 100%, 99.2% and 99.2%, respectively. The MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for 20 patients in group III. It also had 100% PPV, 100% NPV, and 100% total accuracy rates in this group. In three patients in group IV, the MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Its PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRCP is used with increasing frequency as a non-invasive alternative to ERCP and the diagnostic results of MRCP with a heavily T2-weighted TSE MR sequence and ERCP are comparable with high accuracy in various hepatobiliary pathologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18956595     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dig Dis        ISSN: 1751-2972            Impact factor:   2.325


  32 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

Authors:  T Hyodo; S Kumano; F Kushihata; M Okada; M Hirata; T Tsuda; Y Takada; T Mochizuki; T Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the detection of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Zhen-Hua Ma; Qing-Yong Ma; Huan-Chen Sha; Sheng-Li Wu; Jun Wen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledochal cysts: Case series and review.

Authors:  Vikas Y Sacher; James S Davis; Danny Sleeman; Javier Casillas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28

4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same session: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Jin-Feng Zang; Chi Zhang; Jun-Ye Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Alexander Dechêne; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zöpf; Evelin Maldonado de Dechêne; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Impact of magnetic resonance cholangiography in managing liver-transplanted patients: preliminary results of a clinical decision-making study.

Authors:  L Cereser; R Girometti; G Como; C Molinari; P Toniutto; D Bitetto; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Bin Li; Lei Zhang; Zhui-Yang Zhang; Jian-Ming Ni; Feng-qi Lu; Wen-Juan Wu; Chun-juan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group.

Authors:  Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam Vogel; Robert T Russell; Ilan Maizlin; Denise B Klinkner; Stephanie Polites; Barbara Gaines; Christine Leeper; Stallion Anthony; Megan Waddell; Shawn St Peter; David Juang; Rajan Thakkar; Joseph Drews; Brandon Behrens; Mubeen Jafri; Randall S Burd; Marianne Beaudin; Laurence Carmant; Richard A Falcone; Suzanne Moody; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.