Literature DB >> 20157816

Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Sonja Kinner1, Alexander Dechêne, Susanne C Ladd, Thomas Zöpf, Evelin Maldonado de Dechêne, Guido Gerken, Thomas C Lauenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biliary strictures after liver transplantation are common. We aimed to compare different magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences with regard to their diagnostic accuracy in depicting anastomotic stenoses (AST), ischaemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) and cholelithiasis.
METHODS: In patients with clinically suspected biliary obstruction after liver transplantation, MRCP was performed at 1.5 T using two-dimensional (2D) single-shot RARE, 2D T2-weighted (T2w) HASTE, 2D TrueFISP and 3D T2w TSE RESTORE sequences. The presence and localisation of lesions were assessed for each sequence independently and all sequences together. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) served as the "gold standard".
RESULTS: Biliary strictures were detected with a sensitivity of 96% by MRCP and most accurately depicted when all sequences were analysed together. AST was visualised with highest sensitivity on TrueFISP and 3D T2w TSE sequences (79%). For ITBL highest sensitivity was found with the HASTE sequence (81%). Highest sensitivity for filling defects was revealed by the 3D T2w TSE sequence (54%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve/area under the curve (AUC) analysis revealed the best results for the 3D T2w TSE sequence.
CONCLUSION: Our results underline the value of different MRCP sequence types for the depiction of biliary lesions. A clinical protocol consisting of different sequences may be helpful depending on the clinical question and the likely underlying abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20157816     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1714-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

Review 1.  Bile duct complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Andreas Pascher; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  [Endoscopic therapy of ischemia-type biliary lesions in patients following orthotopic liver transplantation].

Authors:  R E Hintze; H Abou-Rebyeh; A Adler; W Veltzke; J Langrehr; B Wiedenmann; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Endoscopic management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  R E Hintze; A Adler; W Veltzke; H Abou-Rebyeh; R Felix; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

5.  Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application.

Authors:  H Irie; H Honda; T Tajima; T Kuroiwa; K Yoshimitsu; K Makisumi; K Masuda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases.

Authors:  M K Bilbao; C T Dotter; T G Lee; R M Katon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.

Authors:  Koray Hekimoglu; Yucel Ustundag; Abdurrahim Dusak; Zuhal Erdem; Bulent Karademir; Selim Aydemir; Sadi Gundogdu
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.325

8.  MR cholangiography: technical advances and clinical applications.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences.

Authors:  T Ichikawa; T Nitatori; J Hachiya; Y Mizutani
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  14 in total

1.  Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Tilman B Schubert; Adnan Said; Joshua D Mezrich; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?

Authors:  Morikatsu Yoshida; Takeshi Nakaura; Taihei Inoue; Shota Tanoue; Sentaro Takada; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Shota Tsumagari; Kazunori Harada; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography using a balanced turbo field echo sequence.

Authors:  Egemen Çifçi; Gökçen Çoban; Tufan Çiçek; Umut Gönülalan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Jorgensen; Akbar K Waljee; Michael L Volk; Christopher J Sonnenday; Grace H Elta; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Amit G Singal; Jason R Taylor; B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Small bowel transplant: state-of-the-art vascular and nonvascular imaging.

Authors:  Catherine E P Panick; Sasan Partovi; Peter S Liu; Baljendra S Kapoor
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

6.  Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group.

Authors:  Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam Vogel; Robert T Russell; Ilan Maizlin; Denise B Klinkner; Stephanie Polites; Barbara Gaines; Christine Leeper; Stallion Anthony; Megan Waddell; Shawn St Peter; David Juang; Rajan Thakkar; Joseph Drews; Brandon Behrens; Mubeen Jafri; Randall S Burd; Marianne Beaudin; Laurence Carmant; Richard A Falcone; Suzanne Moody; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using a 3D Dixon fat-water separated balanced steady state free precession sequence.

Authors:  James F Glockner; Manojkumar Saranathan; Ersin Bayram; Christine U Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography in the assessment and management of biliary complications after OLT.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Lorenzo Cereser; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

9.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound in detection of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Andrej Potthoff; Anreas Hahn; Stefan Kubicka; Andrea Schneider; Jochen Wedemeyer; Juergen Klempnauer; Michael Manns; Michael Gebel; Bita Boozari
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 0.660

10.  3D-MRCP for evaluation of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts: comparison of different acquisition and reconstruction planes.

Authors:  Kristina Imeen Ringe; Dagmar Hartung; Christian von Falck; Frank Wacker; Hans-Jürgen Raatschen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.