Literature DB >> 22422383

CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

T Hyodo1, S Kumano, F Kushihata, M Okada, M Hirata, T Tsuda, Y Takada, T Mochizuki, T Murakami.   

Abstract

Recent developments in imaging technology have enabled CT and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to provide minimally invasive alternatives to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the pre- and post-operative assessment of biliary disease. This article describes anatomical variants of the biliary tree with surgical significance, followed by comparison of CT and MR cholangiographies. Drip infusion cholangiography with CT (DIC-CT) enables high-resolution three-dimensional anatomical representation of very small bile ducts (e.g. aberrant branches, the caudate branch and the cystic duct), which are potential causes of surgical complications. The disadvantages of DIC-CT include the possibility of adverse reactions to biliary contrast media and insufficient depiction of bile ducts caused by liver dysfunction or obstructive jaundice. Conventional MRCP is a standard, non-invasive method for evaluating the biliary tree. MRCP provides useful information, especially regarding the extrahepatic bile ducts and dilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRCP may facilitate the evaluation of biliary structure and excretory function. Understanding the characteristics of each type of cholangiography is important to ensure sufficient perioperative evaluation of the biliary system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422383      PMCID: PMC3474084          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21209407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  60 in total

Review 1.  Bile leaks after surgery.

Authors:  Vibhu Kapoor; Richard L Baron; Mark S Peterson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Human liver caudate lobe and liver segment.

Authors:  Gen Murakami; Fumitake Hata
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  Distributing pattern of the bile duct of the caudate lobe on computed tomography with drip infusion cholangiography and its surgical significance.

Authors:  Susumu Takamatsu; Narihide Goseki; Kazumi Nakajima; Kenichi Teramoto; Takehisa Iwai; Shigeki Arii
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Evaluation of biliary abnormalities with 64-channel multidetector CT.

Authors:  Mariko Hashimoto; Kyo Itoh; Kazuna Takeda; Toyomichi Shibata; Tomohisa Okada; Yoshishige Okuno; Megumu Hino
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay.

Authors:  P V Suhocki; W C Meyers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Spiral computed tomography scanning after intravenous infusion cholangiography for biliary duct anomalies.

Authors:  A H Kwon; S Uetsuji; T Ogura; Y Kamiyama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.

Authors:  Koray Hekimoglu; Yucel Ustundag; Abdurrahim Dusak; Zuhal Erdem; Bulent Karademir; Selim Aydemir; Sadi Gundogdu
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.325

9.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; E K Yucel; D Siegenberg; J T Ferrucci; R Chuttani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Karin A Herrmann; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  36 in total

1.  Analysis of biliary anatomy according to different classification systems.

Authors:  Pranjal Deka; Mahibul Islam; Deepti Jindal; Niteen Kumar; Ankur Arora; Sanjay Singh Negi
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-05

2.  Multidetector CT in detection of troublesome posterior sectoral hepatic duct communicating with cystic duct.

Authors:  Sumiyoshi Tatsuaki; Shima Yasuo; Okabayashi Takehiro; Hata Yasuhiro; Noda Yoshihiro; Kouno Michihiko; Sui Kenta; Negoro Yuji; Sueda Taijiro
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Use of diffusion-weighted imaging in the noninvasive diagnostic of obstructed biliary ducts.

Authors:  Eliane Donato Leite Paro; Andrea Puchnick; Jacob Szejnfeld; Suzan Menasce Goldman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-14

4.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in assessing living liver donors biliary anatomy: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Umberto Baccarani
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography evaluation of intrahepatic bile duct variations with updated classification.

Authors:  Alaaddin Nayman; Orhan Özbek; Seyit Erol; Hayrettin Karakuş; Hasan Emin Kaya
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Imaging follow-up after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Michele Di Martino; Massimo Rossi; Gianluca Mennini; Fabio Melandro; Michele Anzidei; Silvia De Vizio; Kameliya Koryukova; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Potential of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of bile duct ligation-induced liver injury in rabbits.

Authors:  Ying Ding; Sheng-Xiang Rao; Caizhong Chen; Renchen Li; Meng-Su Zeng
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 8.  Expectations from imaging for pre-transplant evaluation of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tiffany Hennedige; Gopinathan Anil; Krishnakumar Madhavan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 9.  Status and future directions in the management of pancreatic cancer: potential impact of nanotechnology.

Authors:  Catherine M Sielaff; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  A new variant of cholecystohepatic duct: MR cholangiography demonstration.

Authors:  Fabio Minutoli; Serena Naso; Carmela Visalli; Dario Iannelli; Salvatore Silipigni; Alessia Pitrone; Antonio Bottari
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.