PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the clinical decision-making process of referring physicians when managing liver-transplanted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 6-month period, 21 liver-transplanted patients with a suspected biliary complication were referred for MRC. Referring physicians were asked to prospectively state, before and after MRC, the leading diagnosis; the level of confidence (on a 0-100% scale); the most appropriate diagnostic/therapeutic plan. Data analysis assessed was the diagnostic yield of MRC; the proportion of change in the leading diagnosis; the therapeutic efficacy (i.e. proportion of change in the initial diagnostic/therapeutic plan); the diagnostic thinking efficacy (i.e., gain in diagnostic confidence). Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. MRC accuracy was also calculated. RESULTS: Data analysis showed a diagnostic yield of 85.7%; a proportion of change in leading diagnosis of 19.0%; a therapeutic efficacy of 42.8%; a diagnostic thinking efficacy for concordant and discordant leading diagnoses of 18.8% and 78.7%, respectively (p<0.01). MRC accuracy was 92.3%. CONCLUSIONS: MRC significantly increased the diagnostic confidence, irrespective of the concordance between pre- and posttest diagnoses. Moreover, MRC determined a change in patient management in a significant proportion of cases, leading to clinical benefits.
PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the clinical decision-making process of referring physicians when managing liver-transplanted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 6-month period, 21 liver-transplanted patients with a suspected biliary complication were referred for MRC. Referring physicians were asked to prospectively state, before and after MRC, the leading diagnosis; the level of confidence (on a 0-100% scale); the most appropriate diagnostic/therapeutic plan. Data analysis assessed was the diagnostic yield of MRC; the proportion of change in the leading diagnosis; the therapeutic efficacy (i.e. proportion of change in the initial diagnostic/therapeutic plan); the diagnostic thinking efficacy (i.e., gain in diagnostic confidence). Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. MRC accuracy was also calculated. RESULTS: Data analysis showed a diagnostic yield of 85.7%; a proportion of change in leading diagnosis of 19.0%; a therapeutic efficacy of 42.8%; a diagnostic thinking efficacy for concordant and discordant leading diagnoses of 18.8% and 78.7%, respectively (p<0.01). MRC accuracy was 92.3%. CONCLUSIONS: MRC significantly increased the diagnostic confidence, irrespective of the concordance between pre- and posttest diagnoses. Moreover, MRC determined a change in patient management in a significant proportion of cases, leading to clinical benefits.
Authors: D Lomanto; P Pavone; A Laghi; V Panebianco; P Mazzocchi; F Fiocca; E Lezoche; R Passariello; V Speranza Journal: Am J Surg Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Ali Akbar; Quynh T Tran; Satheesh P Nair; Salil Parikh; Muhammad Bilal; Mohammed Ismail; Jason M Vanatta; James D Eason; Sanjaya K Satapathy Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2018-04-23