Literature DB >> 18953551

Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies.

Petros V Vlastarakos1, Konstantinos Proikas, Evangelia Tavoulari, Dimitrios Kikidis, Paul Maragoudakis, Thomas P Nikolopoulos.   

Abstract

Superior semicircular canal syndrome (SSCS) includes vestibular and audiological symptoms which result from the introduction of a third mobile window into the osseous cochlea. Surgical repair is considered in cases of incapacitating symptoms. The present paper aims at comparing the different surgical approaches and modes of dehiscence repair, regarding their respective efficacy and potential pitfalls. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of pooled data were performed. Study selection included prospective- and retrospective-controlled studies, prospective- and retrospective-cohort studies, ex vivo studies, animal models, case-reports, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. A total of 64 primary operations for SSC repair were identified; 56 ears were operated for vestibular and 7 for auditory complaints. A total of 33 ears underwent canal plugging, 16 resurfacing, and 15 capping. Success rates were 32/33, 8/16, and 14/15, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant (P=0.001). Resurfacing proved less effective than both plugging (P=0.002), and capping (P=0.01) techniques. Temporalis fascia was commonly used as sealing material and was combined with bone-pâté/bone-wax (plugging), bone-graft (resurfacing), or hydroxyapatite-cement (capping). Most operations were performed via middle-fossa approach; higher success rates were associated with plugging and capping techniques. SNHL and disequilibrium were the most frequent complications encountered. Most cases were followed for 3-6 months. Precise criteria regarding follow-up duration and objective success measures are not determined. Surgical repair of SSCS is considered as a valid therapeutic option for patients with debilitating symptoms. Consensus regarding strict follow-up criteria and objective assessment of success is necessary before larger scale operations can be implemented in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953551     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0840-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  49 in total

Review 1.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  K Brantberg; J Bergenius; A Tribukait
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Superior canal dehiscence is not due to cephalic displacement of the labyrinth.

Authors:  Valeria L Potyagaylo; Charley C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Transmastoid approach for resurfacing of Superior Semicircular Canal dehiscence.

Authors:  M Crovetto; E Areitio; J Elexpuru; F Aguayo
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 1.863

4.  Transmastoid repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  M V Kirtane; A Sharma; D Satwalekar
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Auditory function in patients with surgically treated superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; John P Carey; Sharmila Srireddy; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

7.  Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Dennis S Poe; Michael J McKenna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: positive predictive value of high-resolution CT scanning.

Authors:  Jean-François Cloutier; Manon Bélair; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  24 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Acoustic effects of a superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  J C Luers; D Pazen; H Meister; M Lauxmann; A Eiber; D Beutner; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Transmastoid repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Yi Chen Zhao; Thomas Somers; Joost van Dinther; Robby Vanspauwen; Jacob Husseman; Robert Briggs
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-08

4.  [Indications for operative therapy of vestibular vertigo and the associated success rates].

Authors:  M Westhofen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Acoustic and vestibular effects of superior semicircular canal dehiscence].

Authors:  J-C Luers; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Vertigo induced by noise or pressure to the left ear].

Authors:  D U Seidel; A Dülks; S Remmert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Wenzel; Bryan K Ward; Eva K Ritzl; Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal: a review of the literature on its possible pathogenic explanations.

Authors:  Cristina Brandolini; Giovanni Carlo Modugno; Antonio Pirodda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [Superior canal dehiscence syndrome : Diagnosis with vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and fremitus nystagmus. German version].

Authors:  R Gürkov; C Jerin; W Flatz; R Maxwell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: a case of Tullio phenomenon].

Authors:  C Rohrmeier; H Hilber; J Strutz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.