Literature DB >> 25333320

Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.

Angela Wenzel1, Bryan K Ward, Eva K Ritzl, Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez, Charles C Della Santina, Lloyd B Minor, John P Carey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent findings in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) have shown an elevated ratio of summating potential (SP) to action potential (AP), as measured by electrocochleography (ECochG). Changes in this ratio can be seen during surgical intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of intraoperative ECochG and auditory brainstem response (ABR) as predictive tools for postoperative hearing outcomes after surgical plugging via middle cranial fossa approach for SCD syndrome (SCDS).
METHODS: This was a review of 34 cases (33 patients) in which reproducible intraoperative ECochG recordings were obtained during surgery. Diagnosis of SCDS was based on history, physical examination, vestibular function testing, and computed tomography imaging. Simultaneous intraoperative ECochG and ABR were performed. Pure-tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and at least 1 month postoperatively, and air-bone gap (ABG) was calculated. Changes in SP/AP ratio, SP amplitude, and ABR wave I latency were compared with changes in pure-tone average and ABG before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Median SP/AP ratio of affected ears was 0.62 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.45-0.74) and decreased immediately after surgical plugging of the affected canal to 0.42 (IQR, 0.29-0.52; p < 0.01). Contralateral SP/AP ratio before plugging was 0.33 (IQR, 0.25-0.42) and remained unchanged at the conclusion of surgery (0.30; IQR, 0.25-0.35; p = 0.32). Intraoperative changes in ABR wave I latency and SP amplitude did not predict changes in pure-tone average or ABG after surgery (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the presence of an elevated SP/AP ratio in ears with SCDS. The SP/AP ratio commonly decreases during plugging. However, an intraoperative decrease in SP/AP does not appear to be sensitive to either the beneficial decrease in ABGs or the mild high-frequency sensory loss that can occur in patients undergoing surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal. Future work will determine the value of intraoperative ECochG in predicting changes in vestibular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25333320      PMCID: PMC4752252          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  34 in total

1.  Electrocochleography as a diagnostic and intraoperative adjunct in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Meredith E Adams; Paul R Kileny; Steven A Telian; Hussam K El-Kashlan; Katherine D Heidenreich; Gregory R Mannarelli; H Alexander Arts
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of the vestibulocochlear nerve.

Authors:  Mirela V Simon
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Spontaneous tegmen defect and semicircular canal dehiscence: same etiopathogenic entity?

Authors:  Tarik El Hadi; Tommaso Sorrentino; Marie-Noelle Calmels; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Mathieu Marx
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Diagnosis and outcomes of middle cranial fossa repair for patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  D J Phillips; M A Souter; J Vitkovic; J Vitkovitch; R J Briggs
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Symptoms and signs in superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor; P D Cremer; J P Carey; C C Della Santina; S O Streubel; N Weg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.

Authors:  H P Schlake; C Milewski; R H Goldbrunner; A Kindgen; R Riemann; J Helms; K Roosen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Hearing outcomes after surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yuri Agrawal; Elena Nguyen; Charles C Della Santina; Charles J Limb; Howard W Francis; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Improvement in autophony symptoms after superior canal dehiscence repair.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane; Frank R Lin; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A dehiscent superior semicircular canal may be plugged and resurfaced via the transmastoid route.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Franco Barbieri; Francesca B Pizzini; Alberto Beltramello
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Reversible electrocochleographic abnormalities in superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  H Alexander Arts; Meredith E Adams; Steven A Telian; Hussam El-Kashlan; Paul R Kileny
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characteristics of Wax Occlusion in the Surgical Repair of Superior Canal Dehiscence in Human Temporal Bone Specimens.

Authors:  Yew Song Cheng; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Middle cranial fossa approach for the repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence is associated with greater symptom resolution compared to transmastoid approach.

Authors:  Thien Nguyen; Carlito Lagman; John P Sheppard; Prasanth Romiyo; Courtney Duong; Giyarpuram N Prashant; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Rare Disorders of the Vestibular Labyrinth: of Zebras, Chameleons and Wolves in Sheep's Clothing.

Authors:  Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 4.  Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Lessons from the First 20 Years.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; John P Carey; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Electrocochleography summating potential seen on auditory brainstem response in a case of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Angela Wenzel; Eva K Ritzl; John P Carey
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-05-26

6.  Mechanisms of Hearing Loss in a Guinea Pig Model of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Bu-Sheng Tong; Zi-Yu He; Chen-Ru Ding; Juan-Mei Yang; Jing Wang; Zhao Han; Yi-Bo Huang; Na Gao; Xian-Hao Jia; Fang-Lu Chi; Dong-Dong Ren
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Raymond van de Berg; Vincent van Rompaey; Alexandre Bisdorff; Timothy E Hullar; Miriam S Welgampola; John P Carey
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.