Literature DB >> 18953419

A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants.

Toni Schmader1, Jessica Whitehead, Vicki H Wysocki.   

Abstract

Letters of recommendation are central to the hiring process. However, gender stereotypes could bias how recommenders describe female compared to male applicants. In the current study, text analysis software was used to examine 886 letters of recommendation written on behalf of 235 male and 42 female applicants for either a chemistry or biochemistry faculty position at a large U.S. research university. Results revealed more similarities than differences in letters written for male and female candidates. However, recommenders used significantly more standout adjectives to describe male as compared to female candidates. Letters containing more standout words also included more ability words and fewer grindstone words. Research is needed to explore how differences in language use affect perceivers' evaluations of female candidates.

Year:  2007        PMID: 18953419      PMCID: PMC2572075          DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Roles        ISSN: 0360-0025


  5 in total

1.  Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; T Andrew Poehlman; Eric Luis Uhlmann; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-07

2.  Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.

Authors:  L A Rudman; P Glick
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-11

Review 3.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; M R Banaji
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: activation, dissipation, and resurrection.

Authors:  Ziva Kunda; Paul G Davies; Barbara D Adams; Steven J Spencer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-03

5.  Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes.

Authors:  S L Neuberg; S T Fiske
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-09
  5 in total
  43 in total

1.  Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Romy van der Lee; Naomi Ellemers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Jocelyn Chertoff; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Let's Face It: We Are Biased, and It Should Not Be That Way.

Authors:  Paul A Hemmer; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Wairimu Magua; David R Zimmerman; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  The Future of Women in Psychological Science.

Authors:  June Gruber; Jane Mendle; Kristen A Lindquist; Toni Schmader; Lee Anna Clark; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Modupe Akinola; Lauren Atlas; Deanna M Barch; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Jessica L Borelli; Tiffany N Brannon; Silvia A Bunge; Belinda Campos; Jessica Cantlon; Rona Carter; Adrienne R Carter-Sowell; Serena Chen; Michelle G Craske; Amy J C Cuddy; Alia Crum; Lila Davachi; Angela L Duckworth; Sunny J Dutra; Naomi I Eisenberger; Melissa Ferguson; Brett Q Ford; Barbara L Fredrickson; Sherryl H Goodman; Alison Gopnik; Valerie Purdie Greenaway; Kate L Harkness; Mikki Hebl; Wendy Heller; Jill Hooley; Lily Jampol; Sheri L Johnson; Jutta Joormann; Katherine D Kinzler; Hedy Kober; Ann M Kring; Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Tania Lombrozo; Stella F Lourenco; Kateri McRae; Joan K Monin; Judith T Moskowitz; Misaki N Natsuaki; Gabriele Oettingen; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Nicole Prause; Darby Saxbe; Pamela K Smith; Barbara A Spellman; Virginia Sturm; Bethany A Teachman; Renee J Thompson; Lauren M Weinstock; Lisa A Williams
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09

7.  Differences in Narrative Language in Evaluations of Medical Students by Gender and Under-represented Minority Status.

Authors:  Alexandra E Rojek; Raman Khanna; Joanne W L Yim; Rebekah Gardner; Sarah Lisker; Karen E Hauer; Catherine Lucey; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Christie M Bartels; Anna Kaatz; Christine Kolehmainen
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2015

9.  Patterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Melissa Dattalo; Caitlin Regner; Amarette Filut; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 10.  Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia.

Authors:  Michelle I Cardel; Emily Dhurandhar; Ceren Yarar-Fisher; Monica Foster; Bertha Hidalgo; Leslie A McClure; Sherry Pagoto; Nathanial Brown; Dori Pekmezi; Noha Sharafeldin; Amanda L Willig; Christine Angelini
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.