Literature DB >> 3656080

Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes.

S L Neuberg1, S T Fiske.   

Abstract

How might being outcome dependent on another person influence the processes that one uses to form impressions of that person? We designed three experiments to investigate this question with respect to short-term, task-oriented outcome dependency. In all three experiments, subjects expected to interact with a young man formerly hospitalized as a schizophrenic, and they received information about the person's attributes in either written profiles or videotapes. In Experiment 1, short-term, task-oriented outcome dependency led subjects to use relatively individuating processes (i.e., to base their impressions of the patient on his particular attributes), even under conditions that typically lead subjects to use relatively category-based processes (i.e., to base their impressions on the patient's schizophrenic label). Moreover, in the conditions that elicited individuating processes, subjects spent more time attending to the patient's particular attribute information. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the attention effects in Experiment 1 were not merely a function of impression positivity and that outcome dependency did not influence the impression formation process when attribute information in addition to category-level information was unavailable. Finally, Experiment 3 manipulated not outcome dependency but the attentional goal of forming an accurate impression. We found that accuracy-driven attention to attribute information also led to individuating processes. The results of the three experiments indicate that there are important influences of outcome dependency on impression formation. These results are consistent with a model in which the tendency for short-term, task-oriented outcome dependency to facilitate individuating impression formation processes is mediated by an increase in accuracy-driven attention to attribute information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3656080     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

1.  A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Jessica Whitehead; Vicki H Wysocki
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2007

2.  Status-based asymmetry in intergroup responses: Implications for intergroup reconciliation.

Authors:  Thomas E Malloy; Tiina Ristikari; Rosalie Berrios-Candelaria; Beth Lewis; Fredric Agatstein
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2011-01

Review 3.  How social neuroscience can inform theories of social comparison.

Authors:  Jillian K Swencionis; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Outcome dependency alters the neural substrates of impression formation.

Authors:  Daniel L Ames; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship.

Authors:  Christian E Waugh; Barbara L Fredrickson
Journal:  J Posit Psychol       Date:  2006-04

6.  Relationship of stereotypic beliefs about physicians to health care-relevant behaviors and cognitions among African American women.

Authors:  L M Bogart
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-12

7.  Design approaches to experimental mediation.

Authors:  Angela G Pirlott; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-03-24

8.  Distortions in location memory.

Authors:  Eric Verbeek; Marcia Spetch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  On-line social interactions and executive functions.

Authors:  Oscar Ybarra; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Rapid social perception is flexible: approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces.

Authors:  William A Cunningham; Jay J Van Bavel; Nathan L Arbuckle; Dominic J Packer; Ashley S Waggoner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.