Literature DB >> 18941849

Case reports: Tantalum debris dispersion during revision of a tibial component for TKA.

Jose Miguel Sanchez Marquez1, Nicolas Del Sel, Alejandro Leali, Alejandro González Della Valle.   

Abstract

Porous tantalum nonmodular tibial components for TKA were introduced in 1999. We revised three well-fixed tantalum tibial trays. For removal, we used osteotomes and revision oscillating saw blades. Removal of the components was laborious and resulted in generation of abundant tantalum debris that seeded the periarticular soft tissues despite meticulous protection with gauze. The retained metallic debris that is visible on postoperative radiographs has the potential for generation of third-body wear. We alert the orthopaedic community about this phenomenon and recommend minimizing the use of motorized revision instruments for removal of trabecular metal implants.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941849      PMCID: PMC2650048          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0586-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.

Authors:  Robert Cohen
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

Review 2.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Brett Russell Levine; Scott Sporer; Robert A Poggie; Craig J Della Valle; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Etiology and surgical interventions for stiff total knee replacements.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Alejandro Leali; Steven Haas
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

4.  Removal of a well-fixed trabecular metal monoblock tibial component.

Authors:  Gregg R Klein; Harlan B Levine; Mark A Hartzband
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Similar wear in total hip arthroplasties with metallic or zirconia femoral heads.

Authors:  Randy M Cohn; Alejandro González Della Valle; Margaret Peterson; Charles N Cornell
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  Revision and salvage patellar arthroplasty using a porous tantalum implant.

Authors:  Sam Nasser; Robert A Poggie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Survivorship of monoblock trabecular metal cups in primary THA : midterm results.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Malizos; Konstantinos Bargiotas; Loukia Papatheodorou; Michael Hantes; Theofilos Karachalios
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Alexander Maslaris; Georgios Spyrou; Carsten Schoeneberg; Mustafa Citak; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Do porous tantalum implants help preserve bone?: evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum tibial implants in TKA.

Authors:  Alicia K Harrison; Terence J Gioe; Christine Simonelli; Penny J Tatman; Mary C Schoeller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects.

Authors:  Sebastian Rohe; Nicoletta Dörr; Sabrina Böhle; Georg Matziolis; Steffen Brodt; Eric Röhner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.