Literature DB >> 20066524

Do porous tantalum implants help preserve bone?: evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum tibial implants in TKA.

Alicia K Harrison1, Terence J Gioe, Christine Simonelli, Penny J Tatman, Mary C Schoeller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TKA with conventional metal-backed tibial implants subjects the tibial metaphysis to stress shielding, with resultant loss of bone density. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We hypothesized tibial bone mineral density in patients with porous tantalum (trabecular metal) tibial baseplates would (1) more closely parallel tibial bone mineral density in the nonoperative control limb and (2) be better maintained than in conventional historical controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 41 patients (35 men, six women) 60 years of age or younger undergoing TKA with uncemented trabecular metal tibial components. Patients underwent dual-energy xray absorptiometry scans of both proximal tibiae preoperatively and at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. We determined bone mineral density in three selected regions of interest (Zone 1, between the pegs; Zone 2, beneath the pegs; Zone 3, directly below entire baseplate). Precision analysis revealed a precision error of 4% or less for each region of interest, indicating adequate power to detect bone mineral density changes of 8% or greater.
RESULTS: Bone mineral density percent change was different between the operative and nonoperative knees only in Zone 3 and only at 2 months. There was no change in bone mineral density in any zone in the nonoperative knee at any time. Only in Zone 3 did the bone mineral density decrease at 2 months in the operative knee.
CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular metal implants appear to maintain tibial bone mineral density in a parallel fashion to the nonoperative limb in this population and better than historical controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20066524      PMCID: PMC3049606          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1222-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  26 in total

1.  Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design.

Authors:  J H Lonner; M Klotz; C Levitz; P A Lotke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Bone mineral measurements at the knee using dual photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Methodological evaluation and clinical studies focusing on adaptive bone remodeling following lower extremity fracture, total knee arthroplasty, and partial versus total meniscectomy.

Authors:  M M Petersen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  2000-06

3.  Session III: Total knee replacement in young patients.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component.

Authors:  Thomas J O'Keefe; Suzanne Winter; David G Lewallen; Douglas D Robertson; Robert A Poggie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Changes in local bone density after knee arthroplasty. The use of quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  P Seitz; P Rüegsegger; N Gschwend; L Dubs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-05

6.  The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study.

Authors:  R B Bourne; J B Finlay
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997.

Authors:  O Robertsson; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-10

8.  On aging bone loss.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients.

Authors:  Tarja A Soininvaara; Hannu J A Miettinen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Olavi T Suomalainen; Esko M Alhava; Heikki P Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-10

10.  Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ola L A Harrysson; Otto Robertsson; Jamal F Nayfeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Michael J Stuart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Clinical evaluation with 18 months follow-up of new PTTM enhanced dental implants in maxillo-facial post-oncological patients.

Authors:  Piero Papi; Sara Jamshir; Edoardo Brauner; Stefano Di Carlo; Antonio Ceci; Luca Piccoli; Giorgio Pompa
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-02-09

3.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Application of combined porous tantalum scaffolds loaded with bone morphogenetic protein 7 to repair of osteochondral defect in rabbits<sup/>.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Hui Zhang; Hongquan Gan; Hui Wang; Qijia Li; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Highlighting the advantages and benefits of cementless total knee arthroplasty (Review).

Authors:  Bogdan Uivaraseanu; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Delia Mirela Tit; Octavian Maghiar; Teodor Andrei Maghiar; Calin Hozan; Aurelia Cristina Nechifor; Tapan Behl; Felicia Liana Andronie-Cioara; Jenel Marian Patrascu; Simona Bungau
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Sompop Bencharit; Warren C Byrd; Sandra Altarawneh; Bashir Hosseini; Austin Leong; Glenn Reside; Thiago Morelli; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Preoperative Periarticular Knee Bone Mineral Density in Osteoarthritic Patients Undergoing TKA.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Koji Todoroki; Nobukazu Ezawa; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-08-19

Review 8.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Increasing comorbidity is associated with worsening physical function and pain after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maren E Hilton; Terence Gioe; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  A Review on Bone Mineral Density Loss in Total Knee Replacements Leading to Increased Fracture Risk.

Authors:  M Gundry; S Hopkins; K Knapp
Journal:  Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.