Literature DB >> 18927035

Forgetting is effortful: evidence from reaction time probes in an item-method directed forgetting task.

Jonathan M Fawcett1, Tracy L Taylor.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) was measured in response to visual detection probes embedded within an item-method directed forgetting paradigm. In Experiment 1, study words were presented individually followed by an instruction to remember (R) or forget (F). Probes were presented at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 1,400, 1,800, or 2,600 msec in relation to the study word or memory instruction. After the study trials, a yes-no recognition task measured retention of R and F words. Experiment 2 added a no-word control condition and no-probe catch trials. In both experiments, post-F probe RTs were longer than post-R probe RTs at early SOAs. Confirming that participants attended to the memory instructions, there was a significant directed forgetting effect, with greater recognition of R than of F words. These findings contradict the view that directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm is due to the passive decay of nonrehearsed F items; instead, they are consistent with the view that intentional forgetting in an item-method paradigm occurs via the operation of an active, potentially inhibitory, cognitive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927035     DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control.

Authors:  M C Anderson; C Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Inhibition of return following instructions to remember and forget.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-05

4.  To forget or not to forget: the effect of probability of test on directed forgetting.

Authors:  J M Golding; K L Roper; J Hauselt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1996-05

5.  Larger IOR effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Jonathan M Fawcett
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Neural correlates of successful encoding identified using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Paul J Reber; Robert M Siwiec; Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; M-Marsel Mesulam; Ken A Paller; Darren R Gitleman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Pupillary responses during a short-term memory task: cognitive processing, arousal, or both?

Authors:  D A Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

8.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism.

Authors:  S R Pliszka; M Liotti; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a psychophysiological study of the stop task.

Authors:  Carin C E Overtoom; J Leon Kenemans; Marinus N Verbaten; Chantal Kemner; Maurits W van der Molen; Herman van Engeland; Jan K Buitelaar; Harry S Koelega
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  An electrophysiological test of directed forgetting: the role of retrieval inhibition.

Authors:  M Ullsperger; A Mecklinger; U Müller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

3.  Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  The effects of context in item-based directed forgetting: Evidence for "one-shot" context storage.

Authors:  Nicole Burgess; William E Hockley; Kathleen L Hourihan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

5.  Retrieval-mediated directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm: the effect of semantic cues.

Authors:  Ivan Marevic; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-28

6.  Blocking of irrelevant memories by posterior alpha activity boosts memory encoding.

Authors:  Hyojin Park; Dong Soo Lee; Eunjoo Kang; Hyejin Kang; Jarang Hahm; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The challenge of forgetting: Neurobiological mechanisms of auditory directed forgetting.

Authors:  Olga Lucía Gamboa; Kenneth Sung Lai Yuen; Frederic von Wegner; Marion Behrens; Helmuth Steinmetz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Decomposing item-method directed forgetting of emotional pictures: Equivalent costs and no benefits.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Chelsea K Quinlan; Kelly C H Vullings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

9.  More Is Less: Increased Processing of Unwanted Memories Facilitates Forgetting.

Authors:  Tracy H Wang; Katerina Placek; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A Possible Neural Mechanism of Intentional Forgetting.

Authors:  Madalina Vlasceanu; Michael J Morais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.