Literature DB >> 8685387

To forget or not to forget: the effect of probability of test on directed forgetting.

J M Golding1, K L Roper, J Hauselt.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how individuals use explicit memory cues that designate different probabilities of test. As in typical directed forgetting studies, subjects received words explicitly cued as having either a 0% or a 100% chance of being on a subsequent memory test (i.e. forget and remember cues, respectively). In addition, some words were explicitly cued as having the potential to be either forgotten or remembered (i.e. a 50% cue). Recall of 50% words was between that of 0% and 100% words. In addition, the presence of 50% words lowered recall of the 100% words compared to that of a control group that did not receive 50% words, but received the same number of 100% words. A think-aloud task indicated that these results were due to 50% words being treated like either 100% of 0% words at encoding. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of different probabilities of test on the strategic processing and representation of information.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8685387     DOI: 10.1080/713755625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  2 in total

1.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

2.  Forgetting is effortful: evidence from reaction time probes in an item-method directed forgetting task.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.