Literature DB >> 18927030

Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.

Esther van den Bos1, Fenna H Poletiek.   

Abstract

The present study identified two aspects of complexity that have been manipulated in the implicit learning literature and investigated how they affect implicit and explicit learning of artificial grammars. Ten finite state grammars were used to vary complexity. The results indicated that dependency length is more relevant to the complexity of a structure than is the number of associations that have to be learned. Although implicit learning led to better performance on a grammaticality judgment test than did explicit learning, it was negatively affected by increasing complexity: Performance decreased as there was an increase in the number of previous letters that had to be taken into account to determine whether or not the next letter was a grammatical continuation. In particular, the results suggested that implicit learning of higher order dependencies is hampered by the presence of longer dependencies. Knowledge of first-order dependencies was acquired regardless of complexity and learning mode.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927030     DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.

Authors:  T Johnstone; D R Shanks
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Sequence learning and sequential effects.

Authors:  E Soetens; A Melis; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-25

4.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.

Authors:  Anja Lotz; Annette Kinder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Theories of artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Learning the structure of event sequences.

Authors:  A Cleeremans; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

7.  Two modes of learning for interactive tasks.

Authors:  N A Hayes; D E Broadbent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-04

8.  Effects of learning contexts on implicit and explicit learning.

Authors:  Y S Lee
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-11

9.  Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?

Authors:  D L Rohde; D C Plaut
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-08-25

10.  On the benefits of not trying: brain activity and connectivity reflecting the interactions of explicit and implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  P C Fletcher; O Zafiris; C D Frith; R A E Honey; P R Corlett; K Zilles; G R Fink
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  7 in total

1.  An entropy model for artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

2.  Learning simple and complex artificial grammars in the presence of a semantic reference field: effects on performance and awareness.

Authors:  Esther Van den Bos; Fenna H Poletiek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  How explicit and implicit test instructions in an implicit learning task affect performance.

Authors:  Arnaud Witt; Ira Puspitawati; Annie Vinter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff; Pesia Katan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-25

5.  Learning Predictive Statistics: Strategies and Brain Mechanisms.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yuan Shen; Peter Tino; Andrew E Welchman; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional brain networks for learning predictive statistics.

Authors:  Joseph Giorgio; Vasilis M Karlaftis; Rui Wang; Yuan Shen; Peter Tino; Andrew Welchman; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Learning predictive statistics from temporal sequences: Dynamics and strategies.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yuan Shen; Peter Tino; Andrew E Welchman; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.