Literature DB >> 17338598

Theories of artificial grammar learning.

Emmanuel M Pothos1.   

Abstract

Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is one of the most commonly used paradigms for the study of implicit learning and the contrast between rules, similarity, and associative learning. Despite five decades of extensive research, however, a satisfactory theoretical consensus has not been forthcoming. Theoretical accounts of AGL are reviewed, together with relevant human experimental and neuroscience data. The author concludes that satisfactory understanding of AGL requires (a) an understanding of implicit knowledge as knowledge that is not consciously activated at the time of a cognitive operation; this could be because the corresponding representations are impoverished or they cannot be concurrently supported in working memory with other representations or operations, and (b) adopting a frequency-independent view of rule knowledge and contrasting rule knowledge with specific similarity and associative learning (co-occurrence) knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17338598     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  52 in total

1.  Pattern perception and computational complexity: introduction to the special issue.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Angela D Friederici; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: evidence from artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Elena Ise; Carolin J Arnoldi; Jürgen Bartling; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  How semantic biases in simple adjacencies affect learning a complex structure with non-adjacencies in AGL: a statistical account.

Authors:  Fenna H Poletiek; Jun Lai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Simple stimuli, simple strategies.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard Nusbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Ruskin H Hunt; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Esther van den Bos; Fenna H Poletiek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

7.  Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  T Beesley; A J Wills; M E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Stimulus set size and statistical coverage of the grammar in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Fenna H Poletiek; Tessa J P van Schijndel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

9.  Neural substrates of word category information as the basis of syntactic processing.

Authors:  Luyao Chen; Junjie Wu; Yongben Fu; Huntae Kang; Liping Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.