Literature DB >> 15160294

Sequence learning and sequential effects.

E Soetens1, A Melis, W Notebaert.   

Abstract

In a serial reaction time (RT) task with a probabilistic stimulus sequence, the length of the response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) and the sequence complexity was manipulated to investigate the relationship between sequence learning and sequential effects in serial RT tasks. Sequential effects refer to the influence of previous stimulus presentations on the RT to the current stimulus. Sequence learning is stimulus-transition specific and is demonstrated as the difference between practiced and unpracticed sequences within an interpolated random block of trials. There is a clear parallel between sequence learning and specific changes in sequential effect in the short RSI conditions, suggesting that a common mechanism may lie at the basis of sequence learning and automatic facilitation, which is responsible for sequential effects at short RSI. Importantly, the changes in sequential effects accompanying sequence learning are the same as those observed with practice in random serial RT tasks, indicating that the learning process underlying sequence learning is the same as in random tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15160294     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0163-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  10 in total

1.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

2.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy?

Authors:  N H Kirby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Learning the structure of event sequences.

Authors:  A Cleeremans; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

4.  Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; R L Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Response-to-stimulus interval does not affect implicit motor sequence learning, but does affect performance.

Authors:  D B Willingham; A R Greenberg; R C Thomas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

6.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated.

Authors:  P Lewicki; T Hill; E Bizot
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks.

Authors:  P M Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition.

Authors:  P Bertelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.

Authors:  P A Frensch; C S Miner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

10.  Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts.

Authors:  E Soetens; M Deboeck; J Hueting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  27 in total

1.  Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures.

Authors:  Natacha Deroost; Eric Soetens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-21

2.  Implicit probabilistic sequence learning is independent of explicit awareness.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Natacha Deroost; Inge Zeeuws; Eric Soetens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Response inhibition under task switching: its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation.

Authors:  Michel D Druey; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-09-28

5.  What is the impact of the explicit knowledge of sequence regularities on both deterministic and probabilistic serial reaction time task performance?

Authors:  Nicolas Stefaniak; Sylvie Willems; Stéphane Adam; Thierry Meulemans
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

6.  Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Esther van den Bos; Fenna H Poletiek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

7.  Adult age differences in learning on a sequentially cued prediction task.

Authors:  Kendra L Seaman; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Sleep has no critical role in implicit motor sequence learning in young and old adults.

Authors:  Dezso Nemeth; Karolina Janacsek; Zsuzsa Londe; Michael T Ullman; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Competition between frontal lobe functions and implicit sequence learning: evidence from the long-term effects of alcohol.

Authors:  Marta Virag; Karolina Janacsek; Aniko Horvath; Zoltan Bujdoso; Daniel Fabo; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Automaticity in fast lexical decision sequential effects: much like telling left from right.

Authors:  Roderick Garton; John A Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.