Literature DB >> 1836490

Learning the structure of event sequences.

A Cleeremans1, J L McClelland.   

Abstract

How is complex sequential material acquired, processed, and represented when there is no intention to learn? Two experiments exploring a choice reaction time task are reported. Unknown to Ss, successive stimuli followed a sequence derived from a "noisy" finite-state grammar. After considerable practice (60,000 exposures) with Experiment 1, Ss acquired a complex body of procedural knowledge about the sequential structure of the material. Experiment 2 was an attempt to identify limits on Ss ability to encode the temporal context by using more distant contingencies that spanned irrelevant material. Taken together, the results indicate that Ss become increasingly sensitive to the temporal context set by previous elements of the sequence, up to 3 elements. Responses are also affected by priming effects from recent trials. A connectionist model that incorporates sensitivity to the sequential structure and to priming effects is shown to capture key aspects of both acquisition and processing and to account for the interaction between attention and sequence structure reported by Cohen, Ivry, and Keele (1990).

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1836490     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.120.3.235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  103 in total

1.  Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production.

Authors:  F Chang; G S Dell; K Bock; Z M Griffin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: a random effect analysis of PET data.

Authors:  P Peigneux; P Maquet; T Meulemans; A Destrebecqz; S Laureys; C Degueldre; G Delfiore; J Aerts; A Luxen; G Franck; M Van der Linden; A Cleeremans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: it's probably not dual task.

Authors:  S K Rah; A S Reber; A T Hsiao
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

4.  The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.

Authors:  A T Hsiao; A S Reber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

5.  Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions.

Authors:  Joachim Hoffmann; Claudia Martin; Annette Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-08

6.  Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge.

Authors:  David R Shanks; Pierre Perruchet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

7.  Sequence learning and sequential effects.

Authors:  E Soetens; A Melis; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-25

8.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Age differences in implicit learning of probabilistic unstructured sequences.

Authors:  Jessica R Simon; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 10.  Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.