Literature DB >> 1891209

Pupillary size and responsiveness. Implications for selection of a bifocal intraocular lens.

D D Koch1, S W Samuelson, E A Haft, L M Merin.   

Abstract

The authors measured the pupil sizes of 132 subjects and correlated these to selected designs of annular bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Pupils were measured under five different testing conditions that simulated representative visual tasks: (1) driving at night, (2) reading in dim illumination, (3) reading in bright illumination, (4) distant viewing in indirect sunlight, and (5) distant viewing in direct sunlight. Pupil size diminished with age and with increased illumination. Because of accommodative pupillary constriction, there was little difference in pupil size measured while reading in bright indoor illumination and distant viewing in indirect sunlight. Evaluating a patient's pupil size permits the individualized estimation of the eye's bifocal function following implantation of each of the annular-design bifocal IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1891209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual simulation of retinal images through a decentered monofocal and a refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Kazuno Negishi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Takashi Ikeda; Toru Noda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; David Madrid-Costa; Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  [Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. Investigation of the Array SA40N vs. Acri. Twin at the "physical eye" according to Reiner and Jacobi].

Authors:  F K Jacobi; W Kessler; S Held
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and mesopic pupil size in individuals screened for refractive surgery.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Hashemian; Mohammad Soleimani; Alireza Foroutan; Mahmood Joshaghani; Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah; Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

8.  Light-adjustable lens.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

9.  [Measurement of scotopic pupils: comparison of scotic pupil measurements using a colvard pupilometer and the slitlamp green light test].

Authors:  W Sekundo; G Nietgen; J C Schmidt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Matched comparison of corneal higher order aberrations induced by SMILE to femtosecond assisted LASIK and to PRK in correcting moderate and high myopia: 3.00mm vs. 6.00mm.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Shiva Fayyaz; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.