Literature DB >> 14971588

Light-adjustable lens.

Daniel M Schwartz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: First, to determine whether a silicone light-adjustable intraocular lens (IOL) can be fabricated and adjusted precisely with a light delivery device (LDD). Second, to determine the biocompatibility of an adjustable IOL and whether the lens can be adjusted precisely in vivo.
METHODS: After fabrication of a light-adjustable silicone formulation, IOLs were made and tested in vitro for cytotoxicity, leaching, precision of adjustment, optical quality after adjustment, and mechanical properties. Light-adjustable IOLs were then tested in vivo for biocompatibility and precision of adjustment in a rabbit model. In collaboration with Zeiss-Meditec, a digital LDD was developed and tested to correct for higher-order aberrations in light-adjustable IOLs.
RESULTS: The results establish that a biocompatible silicone IOL can be fabricated and adjusted using safe levels of light. There was no evidence of cytotoxicity or leaching. Testing of mechanical properties revealed no significant differences from commercial controls. Implantation of light-adjustable lenses in rabbits demonstrated- excellent biocompatibility after 6 months, comparable to a commercially available IOL. In vivo spherical (hyperopic and myopic) adjustment in rabbits was achieved using an analog light delivery system. The digital light delivery system was tested and achieved correction of higher-order aberrations.
CONCLUSION: A silicone light-adjustable IOL and LDD have been developed to enable postoperative, noninvasive adjustment of lens power. The ability to correct higher-order aberrations in these materials has broad potential applicability for optimization of vision in patients undergoing cataract and refractive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14971588      PMCID: PMC1358999     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  50 in total

Review 1.  Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  H V Gimbel; R Sun; M T Furlong; J A van Westenbrugge; J Kassab
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Outcome of 1000 consecutive clinic- and hospital-based cataract surgeries in a Danish county.

Authors:  M Wegener; P H Alsbirk; K Højgaard-Olsen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  A comparison of the rate of refractive growth in pediatric aphakic and pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  S K McClatchey; E Dahan; E Maselli; H V Gimbel; M E Wilson; S R Lambert; E G Buckley; S F Freedman; D A Plager; M M Parks
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Toric intraocular lenses for correcting astigmatism in 130 eyes.

Authors:  X Y Sun; D Vicary; P Montgomery; M Griffiths
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Capsule contraction after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis: poly(methyl methacrylate) versus silicone intraocular lenses.

Authors:  B Cochener; P L Jacq; J Colin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  O Nishi; K Nishi; K Sakanishi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1998-07

8.  Long-term results of correction of high myopia with an iris claw phakic intraocular lens.

Authors:  M Landesz; J G Worst; G van Rij
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  The cornea is not a piece of plastic.

Authors:  C Roberts
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.

Authors:  R Menapace; O Findl; K Kriechbaum; Ch Leydolt-Koeppl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Light-adjustable lens: development of in vitro nomograms.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Christian A Sandstedt; Shiao H Chang; Julie A Kornfield; Robert H Grubbs
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

3.  Light-adjustable lens: customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Christian A Sandstedt; Shiao H Chang; Robert H Grubbs; Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

4.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Mujtaba A Qazi; Keith H Edwards; Jeff P Sanderson; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  [The light-adjustable lens. Principles and clinical application].

Authors:  F H Hengerer; A C Mellein; S E Buchner; H B Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and light adjustable lens triple procedure.

Authors:  H Carson Eisenbeisz; Adam R Bleeker; Daniel C Terveen; John P Berdahl
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Visual Outcomes of an Enhanced UV Protected Light Adjustable Lens Using a Novel Co-Managed, Open-Access Methodology.

Authors:  David V Folden; Jennifer R Wong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.