Literature DB >> 18852459

An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.

William T Wojtach1, Kyongje Sung, Sandra Truong, Dale Purves.   

Abstract

When a flash of light is presented in physical alignment with a moving object, the flash is perceived to lag behind the position of the object. This phenomenon, known as the flash-lag effect, has been of particular interest to vision scientists because of the challenge it presents to understanding how the visual system generates perceptions of objects in motion. Although various explanations have been offered, the significance of this effect remains a matter of debate. Here, we show that: (i) contrary to previous reports based on limited data, the flash-lag effect is an increasing nonlinear function of image speed; and (ii) this function is accurately predicted by the frequency of occurrence of image speeds generated by the perspective transformation of moving objects. These results support the conclusion that perceptions of the relative position of a moving object are determined by accumulated experience with image speeds, in this way allowing for visual behavior in response to real-world sources whose speeds and positions cannot be perceived directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852459      PMCID: PMC2566991          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808916105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Untangling spatial from temporal illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Mapping multiple features in the population response of visual cortex.

Authors:  Amit Basole; Leonard E White; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The statistical structure of natural light patterns determines perceived light intensity.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Zhiyong Yang; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Christopher R L Cantor; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A short-range process in apparent motion.

Authors:  O Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Model of human visual-motion sensing.

Authors:  A B Watson; A J Ahumada
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  17 in total

1.  Conscious updating is a rhythmic process.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Rufin Vanrullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An empirical explanation of aperture effects.

Authors:  Kyongje Sung; William T Wojtach; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms.

Authors:  Dale Purves; William T Wojtach; R Beau Lotto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  How biological vision succeeds in the physical world.

Authors:  Dale Purves; Brian B Monson; Janani Sundararajan; William T Wojtach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A neural network trained for prediction mimics diverse features of biological neurons and perception.

Authors:  William Lotter; Gabriel Kreiman; David Cox
Journal:  Nat Mach Intell       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 7.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Paradoxical stabilization of relative position in moving frames.

Authors:  Mert Özkan; Stuart Anstis; Bernard M 't Hart; Mark Wexler; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An empirical explanation of the speed-distance effect.

Authors:  William T Wojtach; Kyongje Sung; Dale Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characteristics of motor resonance predict the pattern of flash-lag effects for biological motion.

Authors:  Klaus Kessler; Lucy Gordon; Kari Cessford; Martin Lages
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.