Literature DB >> 24639506

How biological vision succeeds in the physical world.

Dale Purves1, Brian B Monson, Janani Sundararajan, William T Wojtach.   

Abstract

Biological visual systems cannot measure the properties that define the physical world. Nonetheless, visually guided behaviors of humans and other animals are routinely successful. The purpose of this article is to consider how this feat is accomplished. Most concepts of vision propose, explicitly or implicitly, that visual behavior depends on recovering the sources of stimulus features either directly or by a process of statistical inference. Here we argue that, given the inability of the visual system to access the properties of the world, these conceptual frameworks cannot account for the behavioral success of biological vision. The alternative we present is that the visual system links the frequency of occurrence of biologically determined stimuli to useful perceptual and behavioral responses without recovering real-world properties. The evidence for this interpretation of vision is that the frequency of occurrence of stimulus patterns predicts many basic aspects of what we actually see. This strategy provides a different way of conceiving the relationship between objective reality and subjective experience, and offers a way to understand the operating principles of visual circuitry without invoking feature detection, representation, or probabilistic inference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes' theorem; empirical ranking; lightness; luminance; visual stimuli

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24639506      PMCID: PMC3977276          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311309111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control.

Authors:  O Schwartz; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Bayesian models of object perception.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  The statistical structure of natural light patterns determines perceived light intensity.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges.

Authors:  Emery N Brown; Robert E Kass; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation.

Authors:  David C Knill; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  William T Wojtach; Kyongje Sung; Sandra Truong; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  J H van Hateren; A van der Schaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  Properties of artificial networks evolved to contend with natural spectra.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Mohammad Rostami; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sustained representation of perspectival shape.

Authors:  Jorge Morales; Axel Bax; Chaz Firestone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Will understanding vision require a wholly empirical paradigm?

Authors:  Dale Purves; Yaniv Morgenstern; William T Wojtach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-30

4.  A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision.

Authors:  Jonas Kubilius; Johan Wagemans; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Properties of artificial neurons that report lightness based on accumulated experience with luminance.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Dhara V Rukmini; Brian B Monson; Dale Purves
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Intrinsic spatial knowledge about terrestrial ecology favors the tall for judging distance.

Authors:  Liu Zhou; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  The Eye Pupil's Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness.

Authors:  Daniele Zavagno; Luca Tommasi; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-08-11

Review 8.  Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink; Joachim I Krueger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

9.  Perception and Reality: Why a Wholly Empirical Paradigm is Needed to Understand Vision.

Authors:  Dale Purves; Yaniv Morgenstern; William T Wojtach
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18

10.  Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson; Dani Y Rubinstein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.