Literature DB >> 34131080

Paradoxical stabilization of relative position in moving frames.

Mert Özkan1, Stuart Anstis2, Bernard M 't Hart3, Mark Wexler4, Patrick Cavanagh5,3,6.   

Abstract

To capture where things are and what they are doing, the visual system may extract the position and motion of each object relative to its surrounding frame of reference [K. Duncker, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 161-172 (1929) and G. Johansson, Acta Psychol (Amst.) 7, 25-79 (1950)]. Here we report a particularly powerful example where a paradoxical stabilization is produced by a moving frame. We first take a frame that moves left and right and we flash its right edge before, and its left edge after, the frame's motion. For all frame displacements tested, the two edges are perceived as stabilized, with the left edge on the left and right edge on the right, separated by the frame's width as if the frame were not moving. This stabilization is paradoxical because the motion of the frame itself remains visible, albeit much reduced. A second experiment demonstrated that unlike other motion-induced position shifts (e.g., flash lag, flash grab, flash drag, or Fröhlich), the illusory shift here is independent of speed and is set instead by the distance of the frame's travel. In this experiment, two probes are flashed inside the frame at the same physical location before and after the frame moves. Despite being physically superimposed, the probes are perceived widely separated, again as if they were seen in the frame's coordinates and the frame were stationary. This paradoxical stabilization suggests a link to visual stability across eye movements where the displacement of the entire visual scene may act as a frame to stabilize the perception of relative locations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motion; position; vision; visual stability

Year:  2021        PMID: 34131080      PMCID: PMC8237653          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102167118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects.

Authors:  D Whitney; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perisaccadic mislocalization without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  F Ostendorf; C Fischer; B Gaymard; C J Ploner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Post-saccadic location judgments reveal remapping of saccade targets to non-foveal locations.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Martin Rolfs; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Apparent position of visual targets during real and simulated saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M C Morrone; J Ross; D C Burr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Field-like interactions between motion-based reference frames.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Öğmen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview.

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Mislocation of test flashes during saccadic image displacements.

Authors:  D M MacKay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.

Authors:  Jonathan Peirce; Jeremy R Gray; Sol Simpson; Michael MacAskill; Richard Höchenberger; Hiroyuki Sogo; Erik Kastman; Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; Matthew Fanelli; Sean Kelly; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.