Literature DB >> 18846406

Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial.

Luigi Bonavina1, Greta I Saino, Davide Bona, John Lipham, Robert A Ganz, Daniel Dunn, Tom DeMeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease continues to encourage the development of treatment modalities to fill the gap between acid-suppression therapy and the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation device has been designed to augment the lower esophageal sphincter barrier using magnetic force. A multi-center feasibility trial was done to evaluate safety and efficacy.
METHODS: Patients with typical heartburn (at least partially responding to proton-pump inhibitors), abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and normal esophageal peristalsis were enrolled. Patients with hiatal hernia >3 cm were excluded from the study. The device was implanted laparoscopically around the distal esophagus.
RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, 38 out of 41 enrolled patients underwent this procedure in 3 hospitals. No operative complications were recorded. A free diet was allowed since post-operative day one, and 97% of patients were discharged within 48 h. The mean follow-up was 209 days (range 12-434 days). The GERD-HRQL score decreased from 26.0 to 1.0 (p < 0.005). At 3 months post-operatively, 89% of patients were off anti-reflux medications, and 79% of patients had a normal 24-h pH test. All patients preserved the ability to belch. Mild dysphagia occurred in 45% of patients. No migrations or erosions of the device occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic implant of the MSA device is safe and well tolerated. It requires minimal surgical dissection and a short learning curve compared to the conventional Nissen fundoplication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846406     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0698-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Yongliang Wei; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Magnetic enhancement of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Mechanical effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on the competency of the gastric cardia: pathophysiologic implications and surgical perspectives.

Authors:  L Bonavina; T DeMeester; R Mason; H J Stein; H Feussner; A Evander
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Vanessa Salinas; Charles-J Filipi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do.

Authors:  Christopher G Streets; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: clinical outcomes at 10 years.

Authors:  Jamie J Kelly; David I Watson; Kin Fah Chin; Peter G Devitt; Philip A Game; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes.

Authors:  Craig B Morgenthal; Matthew D Shane; Alessandro Stival; Nana Gletsu; Graham Milam; Vickie Swafford; John G Hunter; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  38 in total

1.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: beyond proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Tiberiu Hershcovici; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years.

Authors:  John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Robert A Ganz; Luigi Bonavina; Greta Saino; Daniel H Dunn; Paul Fockens; Willem Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Novel treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Adam Barker; Jefferson Hurley
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

4.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective option for refractory duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux following Billroth II gastrectomy.

Authors:  Matteo Melloni; Veronica Lazzari; Emanuele Asti; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-08

Review 5.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Veronica Lazzari; Andrea Sironi; Matteo Porta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-18

6.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  SAGES technology and value assessment committee (TAVAC) safety and effectiveness analysis: LINX® reflux management system.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; Andrew S Wright; Paresh C Shah; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Does anti-reflux surgery disrupt the pathway of Barrett's esophagus progression to cancer?

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Ivan Kristo; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 9.  Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hongke Zhang; Dinghui Dong; Zhengwen Liu; Shuixiang He; Liangshuo Hu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Review of antireflux procedures for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Hillman; R Yadlapati; M Whitsett; A J Thuluvath; M A Berendsen; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.