Literature DB >> 16718747

Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Atif Iqbal1, Vanessa Salinas, Charles-J Filipi.   

Abstract

The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. New potent antisecretory drugs and the development of minimally invasive surgery for the management of GERD are at present the pivotal and largely accepted approaches to treatment. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. New journal articles and abstracts are continuously being published. The Food and Drug Administration has approved 3 modalities, thus gastroenterologists and surgeons are beginning to apply these techniques. Further trials and device refinements will assist clinicians. This article will present an overview of the various techniques that are currently on study. This review will report the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The potential for widespread use of these techniques will also be discussed. Articles and abstracts published in English on this topic were retrieved from Pubmed. Due to limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were not used for the pooled data presented, however, an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-PPI scoring as baseline and intent to treat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16718747      PMCID: PMC4130969          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  44 in total

1.  Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: 12-month follow-up for the North American open-label trial.

Authors:  Douglas Pleskow; Richard Rothstein; Simon Lo; Robert Hawes; Richard Kozarek; Gregory Haber; Christopher Gostout; Anthony Lembo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Antireflux operations at flexible endoscopy using endoluminal stitching techniques: an experimental study.

Authors:  S S Kadirkamanathan; D F Evans; F Gong; E Yazaki; M Scott; C P Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Effects of prior endoluminal gastroplication on subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  B Tierney; A Iqbal; M Haider; C Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long-term follow-up study of the Stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A Torquati; H L Houston; J Kaiser; M D Holzman; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Medical therapy for chronic reflux esophagitis. Long-term follow-up.

Authors:  D A Lieberman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 7.  Biology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: pathophysiology relating to medical and surgical treatment.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; J H Peters; C G Bremner; P Chandrasoma
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  Long-term outcomes of endoluminal gastroplication: a U.S. multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yang K Chen; Isaac Raijman; Tamir Ben-Menachem; Anthony A Starpoli; Julia Liu; Haleh Pazwash; Stacey Weiland; Mamun Shahrier; Evelina Fortajada; John R Saltzman; David L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Michael R Go; John M Dundon; Dianne J Karlowicz; Carlos B Domingo; Peter Muscarella; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D Liebermann-Meffert; M Allgöwer; P Schmid; A L Blum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventional upper endoscopy: the pediatric perspective.

Authors:  Steven Liu; Petar Mamula; Chris A Liacouras
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-12

2.  Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

Authors:  O O Koch; M Schurich; S A Antoniou; G Spaun; A Kaindlstorfer; R Pointner; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study.

Authors:  G B Cadière; A Rajan; O Germay; J Himpens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Greta I Saino; Davide Bona; John Lipham; Robert A Ganz; Daniel Dunn; Tom DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Patient factors predictive of 24-h pH normalization following endoluminal gastroplication for GERD.

Authors:  Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Michael Ujiki; Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Allograft dermal matrix hiatoplasty during laparoscopic primary fundoplication, paraesophageal hernia repair, and reoperation for failed hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Reginald C W Bell; Jacqueline Fearon; Katherine D Freeman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.