Literature DB >> 8554444

The lack of value of repeated Clostridium difficile cytotoxicity assays.

A A Renshaw1, J M Stelling, M H Doolittle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of repeated Clostridium difficile cytotoxicity assays (CA).
DESIGN: All CAs performed during 1993 were retrospectively reviewed and correlated with clinical data. Assays were grouped into episodes, which were defined as one or more successive tests performed on a single patient within 7 days or less of each other.
SETTING: A 751-bed tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: All patients with Clostridium difficile CAs submitted to the microbiology laboratory.
RESULTS: There were 947 episodes with two or more CAs. In 15 of these episodes, a negative CA result was followed by a positive result, and in 25 cases, a positive result was followed by a negative one. We reviewed the clinical data for these cases. Of the 947 episodes with two or more CAs, the repeated assays provided new information that was used in patient care in fewer than nine cases. Repeated testing within 7 days of an initial CA accounted for 36% of all assays performed, but provided clinically useful information in only about 1% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Clostridium difficile CAs should not be repeated within a 7-day period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8554444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  10 in total

1.  Frequency of sample submission for optimal utilization of the cell culture cytotoxicity assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Authors:  Anita P Borek; Deborah Z Aird; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Edward C Oldfield; Edward C Oldfield; David A Johnson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  D O'Connor; P Hynes; M Cormican; E Collins; G Corbett-Feeney; M Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Scott Curry
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.935

7.  The value of repeat Clostridium difficile toxin testing during and after an outbreak of C difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Joseph Dylewski
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing.

Authors:  Diana M Cardona; Kenneth H Rand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Repeated enzyme immunoassays have limited utility in diagnosing Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  M Drees; D R Snydman; C E O'Sullivan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.