Literature DB >> 18841852

An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Federica Zanca1, Dev Prasad Chakraborty, Chantal Van Ongeval, Jurgen Jacobs, Filip Claus, Guy Marchal, Hilde Bosmans.   

Abstract

The assessment of the performance of a digital mammography system requires an observer study with a relatively large number of cases with known truth which is often difficult to assemble. Several investigators have developed methods for generating hybrid abnormal images containing simulated microcalcifications. This article addresses some of the limitations of earlier methods. The new method is based on digital images of needle biopsy specimens. Since the specimens are imaged separately from the breast, the microcalcification attenuation profile scan is deduced without the effects of over and underlying tissues. The resulting templates are normalized for image acquisition specific parameters and reprocessed to simulate microcalcifications appropriate to other imaging systems, with different x-ray, detector and image processing parameters than the original acquisition system. This capability is not shared by previous simulation methods that have relied on extracting microcalcifications from breast images. The method was validated by five experienced mammographers who compared 59 pairs of simulated and real microcalcifications in a two-alternative forced choice task designed to test if they could distinguish the real from the simulated lesions. They also classified the shapes of the microcalcifications according to a standardized clinical lexicon. The observed probability of correct choice was 0.415, 95% confidence interval (0.284, 0.546), showing that the radiologists were unable to distinguish the lesions. The shape classification revealed substantial agreement with the truth (mean kappa = 0.70), showing that we were able to accurately simulate the lesion morphology. While currently limited to single microcalcifications, the method is extensible to more complex clusters of microcalcifications and to three-dimensional images. It can be used to objectively assess an imaging technology, especially with respect to its ability to adequately visualize the morphology of the lesions, which is a critical factor in the benign versus malignant classification of a lesion detected in screening mammography.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18841852      PMCID: PMC2673659          DOI: 10.1118/1.2968334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  S V Beiden; R F Wagner; G Campbell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques.

Authors:  B M Hemminger; S Zong; K E Muller; C S Coffey; M C DeLuca; R E Johnston; E D Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Development and validation of a simulation procedure to study the visibility of micro calcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Hilde Bosmans; Chantal Van Ongeval; Geert Souverijns; Frank Rogge; Andreas Van Steen; Guy Marchal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  [Diagnostic value of clustered microcalcifications discovered by mammography (apropos of 227 cases with histological verification and without a palpable breast tumor)].

Authors:  M Le Gal; G Chavanne; D Pellier
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications.

Authors:  A Fandos-Morera; M Prats-Esteve; J M Tura-Soteras; A Traveria-Cros
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast: a radiological and pathological study.

Authors:  R R Millis; R Davis; A J Stacey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Hilde Bosmans; Dirk Vandenbroucke; Geert Souverijns; Chantal Van Ongeval; Octavian Dragusin; Guy Marchal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of visual grading and free-response ROC analyses for assessment of image-processing algorithms in digital mammography.

Authors:  F Zanca; C Van Ongeval; F Claus; J Jacobs; R Oyen; H Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Xuetong Zhai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.

Authors:  Hyo-Min Cho; Huanjun Ding; William C Barber; Jan S Iwanczyk; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; Alistair Mackenzie; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Dev P Chakraborty; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.