Literature DB >> 18834898

Bayesian surprise attracts human attention.

Laurent Itti1, Pierre Baldi.   

Abstract

We propose a formal Bayesian definition of surprise to capture subjective aspects of sensory information. Surprise measures how data affects an observer, in terms of differences between posterior and prior beliefs about the world. Only data observations which substantially affect the observer's beliefs yield surprise, irrespectively of how rare or informative in Shannon's sense these observations are. We test the framework by quantifying the extent to which humans may orient attention and gaze towards surprising events or items while watching television. To this end, we implement a simple computational model where a low-level, sensory form of surprise is computed by simple simulated early visual neurons. Bayesian surprise is a strong attractor of human attention, with 72% of all gaze shifts directed towards locations more surprising than the average, a figure rising to 84% when focusing the analysis onto regions simultaneously selected by all observers. The proposed theory of surprise is applicable across different spatio-temporal scales, modalities, and levels of abstraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834898      PMCID: PMC2782645          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  43 in total

1.  Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  S P Brown; R H Masland
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images.

Authors:  J R Müller; A B Metha; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differences of monkey and human overt attention under natural conditions.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Wolfgang Kruse; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Peter König
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

7.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities.

Authors:  A M Sillito; K L Grieve; H E Jones; J Cudeiro; J Davis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Dopamine-dependent facilitation of LTP induction in hippocampal CA1 by exposure to spatial novelty.

Authors:  Shaomin Li; William K Cullen; Roger Anwyl; Michael J Rowan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Calmodulin permanently associates with rat olfactory CNG channels under native conditions.

Authors:  Jonathan Bradley; Wolfgang Bönigk; King-Wai Yau; Stephan Frings
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  135 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials and the efficiency of visual search for vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Jasmin Kizilirmak; Carolin Liebscher; Julia Runge; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Roger C Barr; Loren W Nolte; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

3.  Image statistics of the environment surrounding freely behaving hoverflies.

Authors:  Olga Dyakova; Martin M Müller; Martin Egelhaaf; Karin Nordström
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

5.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Pierre-Yves Oudeyer; Manuel Lopes; Adrien Baranes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Matthew R Sutherland
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

8.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention.

Authors:  Pierre Baldi; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2009-12-28

10.  Embodied inference and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.