Literature DB >> 22843089

Embodied inference and spatial cognition.

Karl Friston1.   

Abstract

How much about our interactions with--and experience of--our world can be deduced from basic principles? This paper reviews recent attempts to understand the self-organised behaviour of embodied agents, like ourselves, as satisfying basic imperatives for sustained exchanges with the environment. In brief, one simple driving force appears to explain many aspects of perception, action and the perception of action. This driving force is the minimisation of surprise or prediction error, which--in the context of perception--corresponds to Bayes-optimal predictive coding (that suppresses exteroceptive prediction errors) and--in the context of action--reduces to classical motor reflexes (that suppress proprioceptive prediction errors). In what follows, we look at some of the phenomena that emerge from this single principle, such as the perceptual encoding of spatial trajectories that can both generate movement (of self) and recognise the movements (of others). These emergent behaviours rest upon prior beliefs about itinerant (wandering) states of the world--but where do these beliefs come from? In this paper, we focus on the nature of prior beliefs and how they underwrite the active sampling of a spatially extended sensorium. Put simply, to avoid surprising states of the world, it is necessary to minimise uncertainty about those states. When this minimisation is implemented via prior beliefs--about how we sample the world--the resulting behaviour is remarkably reminiscent of searches seen in foraging or visual searches with saccadic eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843089      PMCID: PMC3425745          DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0519-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  28 in total

1.  Predictability, complexity, and learning.

Authors:  W Bialek; I Nemenman; N Tishby
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Connecting mirror neurons and forward models.

Authors:  R C Miall
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  A neural model of multimodal adaptive saccadic eye movement control by superior colliculus.

Authors:  S Grossberg; K Roberts; M Aguilar; D Bullock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Action understanding and active inference.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Jérémie Mattout; James Kilner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention.

Authors:  Laurent Itti; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  The mirror-neuron system.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Laila Craighero
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Variance as a signature of neural computations during decision making.

Authors:  Anne K Churchland; R Kiani; R Chaudhuri; Xiao-Jing Wang; Alexandre Pouget; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Perception and hierarchical dynamics.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Jean Daunizeau; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Hierarchical models in the brain.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: Explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia.

Authors:  Anil K Seth
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.065

Review 2.  Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning.

Authors:  Justin C Hayes; David J M Kraemer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  The Predictive Processing Model of EMDR.

Authors:  D Eric Chamberlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 4.  Minimal self-models and the free energy principle.

Authors:  Jakub Limanowski; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The "face race lightness illusion": An effect of the eyes and pupils?

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Kenneth Gitiye Kiambarua; Thomas Hagen; Agata Bochynska; Jamie Lubell; Hikaru Suzuki; Matia Okubo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.