Literature DB >> 16375943

Differences of monkey and human overt attention under natural conditions.

Wolfgang Einhäuser1, Wolfgang Kruse, Klaus-Peter Hoffmann, Peter König.   

Abstract

Rhesus monkeys are widely used as animal models of human attention. Such research rests upon the assumption that similar mechanisms underlie attention in both species. Here, we directly compare the influence of low-level stimulus features on overt attention in monkeys and humans under natural conditions. We recorded eye-movements in humans and rhesus monkeys during free-viewing of natural images. We find that intrinsic low-level features, such luminance-contrast, texture-contrast and saliency-as predicted by a standard model, are elevated at fixation points in the majority of images. These correlative effects are not significantly different between species. However, local image modifications affect both species differently: moderate modifications, which are in the range of natural fluctuations, attract overt attention in monkeys significantly stronger than they do in humans. In addition, humans show a higher inter-individual consistency regarding which locations they fixate than monkeys, in spite of the similarity for intrinsic low-level features. Taken together, these data demonstrate that-under natural conditions-low-level stimulus features affect attention in monkeys and humans differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16375943     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Saliency and saccade encoding in the frontal eye field during natural scene search.

Authors:  Hugo L Fernandes; Ian H Stevenson; Adam N Phillips; Mark A Segraves; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Population coding in area V4 during rapid shape detections.

Authors:  Katherine F Weiner; Geoffrey M Ghose
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Anna E Ipata; James W Bisley; Jacqueline Gottlieb; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Human and monkey infant attention to dynamic social and nonsocial stimuli.

Authors:  Sarah E Maylott; Annika Paukner; Yeojin A Ahn; Elizabeth A Simpson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Overt attention toward oriented objects in free-viewing barn owls.

Authors:  Wolf Maximilian Harmening; Julius Orlowski; Ohad Ben-Shahar; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd; Shawn A Steckenfinger; Uri Hasson; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Time course of target recognition in visual search.

Authors:  Andreas Kotowicz; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Influence of low-level stimulus features, task dependent factors, and spatial biases on overt visual attention.

Authors:  Sepp Kollmorgen; Nora Nortmann; Sylvia Schröder; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention.

Authors:  Laurent Itti; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Charles R Menzel; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Ken Sayers; J David Smith; David A Washburn
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.