Literature DB >> 29527659

Robust Machine Learning Variable Importance Analyses of Medical Conditions for Health Care Spending.

Sherri Rose1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To propose nonparametric double robust machine learning in variable importance analyses of medical conditions for health spending. DATA SOURCES: 2011-2012 Truven MarketScan database. STUDY
DESIGN: I evaluate how much more, on average, commercially insured enrollees with each of 26 of the most prevalent medical conditions cost per year after controlling for demographics and other medical conditions. This is accomplished within the nonparametric targeted learning framework, which incorporates ensemble machine learning. Previous literature studying the impact of medical conditions on health care spending has almost exclusively focused on parametric risk adjustment; thus, I compare my approach to parametric regression. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: My results demonstrate that multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, severe cancers, major depression and bipolar disorders, and chronic hepatitis are the most costly medical conditions on average per individual. These findings differed from those obtained using parametric regression.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature may be underestimating the spending contributions of several medical conditions, which is a potentially critical oversight. If current methods are not capturing the true incremental effect of medical conditions, undesirable incentives related to care may remain. Further work is needed to directly study these issues in the context of federal formulas. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Risk adjustment; machine learning; regression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29527659      PMCID: PMC6153184          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  20 in total

1.  The HHS-HCC risk adjustment model for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope; Melvin Ingber; Sara Freeman; Lindsey Patterson; Michael Cohen; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-09

2.  National health spending by medical condition, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Charles Roehrig; George Miller; Craig Lake; Jenny Bryant
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Finding Quantitative Trait Loci Genes with Collaborative Targeted Maximum Likelihood Learning.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

6.  A Machine Learning Framework for Plan Payment Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Mental Health Risk Adjustment with Clinical Categories and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Akritee Shrestha; Savannah Bergquist; Ellen Montz; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Biomarker discovery using targeted maximum-likelihood estimation: application to the treatment of antiretroviral-resistant HIV infection.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Maya L Petersen; Soo-Yon Rhee; W Jeffrey Fessel; Sandra E Sinisi; Robert W Shafer; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Estimation of a non-parametric variable importance measure of a continuous exposure.

Authors:  Antoine Chambaz; Pierre Neuvial; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.125

10.  Achieving Mental Health Care Parity Might Require Changes In Payments And Competition.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating treatment effects with machine learning.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Stephan Lindner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Identifying undercompensated groups defined by multiple attributes in risk adjustment.

Authors:  Anna Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-09

3.  Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.