Literature DB >> 12891065

Clinically relevant interpretation of genotype for resistance to abacavir.

Françoise Brun-Vézinet1, Diane Descamps, Annick Ruffault, Bernard Masquelier, Vincent Calvez, Gilles Peytavin, Fabienne Telles, Laurence Morand-Joubert, Jean-Luc Meynard, Muriel Vray, Dominique Costagliola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a stepwise methodology for the development and validation of clinically relevant genotypic score for resistance to antiretroviral drugs and to apply this approach to the genotypic resistance to abacavir.
METHODS: All patients having received abacavir during the Narval trial were included in this study. The impact of each nucleoside analogue resistance mutation on the virologic response to abacavir was studied in a univariate analysis. Mutations with a P value < 0.20 and those selected by abacavir were retained. According to the number of mutations three levels of resistance were defined. A multivariate analysis accounting for confonding variables assessed whether the genotypic score was an independent predictor of the response. The robustness of the score was analysed using the bootstrap resampling method.
RESULTS: In the 175 patients exposed to abacavir, the strongest association between the decrease in viral load and the number of mutations was observed with a set of six mutations at codons 41, 67, 210, 215, 74 and 184 of the reverse transcriptase gene. In patients with fewer than four mutations (no evidence of resistance) the median decrease in viral load was -1.64 log(10) copies/ml while it was -0.69 log(10) and -0.19 log(10) in those with four (possible resistance) and five or six (resistance) mutations respectively. In the multivariate analysis this score was an independent predictor of the response. The bootstrap analysis showed the robustness of the score.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new strategy for the analysis of correlation between genotype profile at baseline and virologic response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12891065     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200308150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  15 in total

Review 1.  Changing patterns in the selection of viral mutations among patients receiving nucleoside and nucleotide drug combinations directed against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Mark A Wainberg; Bluma G Brenner; Dan Turner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  HIV-1 drug resistance mutations: an updated framework for the second decade of HAART.

Authors:  Robert W Shafer; Jonathan M Schapiro
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  An Evolutionary Model-Based Approach To Quantify the Genetic Barrier to Drug Resistance in Fast-Evolving Viruses and Its Application to HIV-1 Subtypes and Integrase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Kristof Theys; Pieter J K Libin; Kristel Van Laethem; Ana B Abecasis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens containing abacavir with tenofovir in treatment-experienced patients: predictors of virological response and drug resistance evolution in a multi-cohort study.

Authors:  S Di Giambenedetto; C Torti; M Prosperi; N Manca; G Lapadula; G Paraninfo; N Ladisa; M Zazzi; M Trezzi; P Cicconi; P Corsi; P Nasta; R Cauda; A De Luca
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Clinically relevant interpretation of genotype and relationship to plasma drug concentrations for resistance to saquinavir-ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Authors:  Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Cécile Dalban; Gilles Peytavin; Claire Lamotte; Rachid Agher; Constance Delaugerre; Marc Wirden; Françoise Conan; Sylvie Dantin; Christine Katlama; Dominique Costagliola; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Clinically relevant genotype interpretation of resistance to didanosine.

Authors:  Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Philippe Flandre; Juliette Pavie; Nathalie Schmidely; Marc Wirden; Olivier Lada; Dan Chiche; Jean-Michel Molina; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation.

Authors:  Tommy F Liu; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Biomarker discovery using targeted maximum-likelihood estimation: application to the treatment of antiretroviral-resistant HIV infection.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Maya L Petersen; Soo-Yon Rhee; W Jeffrey Fessel; Sandra E Sinisi; Robert W Shafer; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Abacavir/lamivudine combination in the treatment of HIV: a review.

Authors:  Geetha Sivasubramanian; Emmanuel Frempong-Manso; Rodger D Macarthur
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Two different patterns of mutations are involved in the genotypic resistance score for atazanavir boosted versus unboosted by ritonavir in multiple failing patients.

Authors:  M M Santoro; A Bertoli; P Lorenzini; F Ceccherini-Silberstein; N Gianotti; C Mussini; C Torti; G Di Perri; G Barbarini; T Bini; S Melzi; P Caramello; R Maserati; P Narciso; V Micheli; A Antinori; C F Perno
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.