Literature DB >> 18825305

Amino acid contacts in proteins adapted to different temperatures: hydrophobic interactions and surface charges play a key role.

Gisle Saelensminde1, Øyvind Halskau, Inge Jonassen.   

Abstract

Thermophiles, mesophiles, and psychrophiles have different amino acid frequencies in their proteins, probably because of the way the species adapt to very different temperatures in their environment. In this paper, we analyse how contacts between sidechains vary between homologous proteins from species that are adapted to different temperatures, but displaying relatively high sequence similarity. We investigate whether specific contacts between amino acids sidechains is a key factor in thermostabilisation in proteins. The dataset was divided into two subsets with optimal growth temperatures from 0-40 and 35-102 degrees C. Comparison of homologues was made between low-temperature species and high-temperature species within each subset. We found that unspecific interactions like hydrophobic interactions in the core and solvent interactions and entropic effects at the surface, appear to be more important factors than specific contact types like salt bridges and aromatic clusters.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18825305     DOI: 10.1007/s00792-008-0192-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Extremophiles        ISSN: 1431-0651            Impact factor:   2.395


  37 in total

1.  GenBank.

Authors:  D A Benson; I Karsch-Mizrachi; D J Lipman; J Ostell; B A Rapp; D L Wheeler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Electrostatic contributions to the stability of a thermophilic cold shock protein.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Feng Dong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Role of cation-pi interactions to the stability of thermophilic proteins.

Authors:  M Michael Gromiha; Shali Thomas; C Santhosh
Journal:  Prep Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Elucidation of factors responsible for enhanced thermal stability of proteins: a structural genomics based study.

Authors:  Suvobrata Chakravarty; Raghavan Varadarajan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Molecular simulations suggest protein salt bridges are uniquely suited to life at high temperatures.

Authors:  Andrew S Thomas; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  The stability of salt bridges at high temperatures: implications for hyperthermophilic proteins.

Authors:  A H Elcock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Impact of local and non-local interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding.

Authors:  V I Abkevich; A M Gutin; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Compositional changes in RNA, DNA and proteins for bacterial adaptation to higher and lower temperatures.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakashima; Satoshi Fukuchi; Ken Nishikawa
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.387

10.  The genomics of disulfide bonding and protein stabilization in thermophiles.

Authors:  Morgan Beeby; Brian D O'Connor; Carsten Ryttersgaard; Daniel R Boutz; L Jeanne Perry; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  20 in total

1.  Amino acid compositional shifts during streptophyte transitions to terrestrial habitats.

Authors:  Richard W Jobson; Yin-Long Qiu
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  In silico characterization of thermostable lipases.

Authors:  Debamitra Chakravorty; Saravanan Parameswaran; Vikash Kumar Dubey; Sanjukta Patra
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  How do thermophilic proteins and proteomes withstand high temperature?

Authors:  Lucas Sawle; Kingshuk Ghosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Comparative Metagenomics of Eight Geographically Remote Terrestrial Hot Springs.

Authors:  Peter Menzel; Sóley Ruth Gudbergsdóttir; Anne Gunn Rike; Lianbing Lin; Qi Zhang; Patrizia Contursi; Marco Moracci; Jakob K Kristjansson; Benjamin Bolduc; Sergey Gavrilov; Nikolai Ravin; Andrey Mardanov; Elizaveta Bonch-Osmolovskaya; Mark Young; Anders Krogh; Xu Peng
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  HU histone-like DNA-binding protein from Thermus thermophilus: structural and evolutionary analyses.

Authors:  Anna C Papageorgiou; Panagiotis S Adam; Philemon Stavros; George Nounesis; Rob Meijers; Kyriacos Petratos; Constantinos E Vorgias
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Function and biotechnology of extremophilic enzymes in low water activity.

Authors:  Ram Karan; Melinda D Capes; Shiladitya Dassarma
Journal:  Aquat Biosyst       Date:  2012-02-02

7.  In Silico Analysis of β-Galactosidases Primary and Secondary Structure in relation to Temperature Adaptation.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar; Nikhil Sharma; Tek Chand Bhalla
Journal:  J Amino Acids       Date:  2014-03-24

8.  Amino acid substitutions in cold-adapted proteins from Halorubrum lacusprofundi, an extremely halophilic microbe from antarctica.

Authors:  Shiladitya Dassarma; Melinda D Capes; Ram Karan; Priya Dassarma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Psychrophilic enzymes: from folding to function and biotechnology.

Authors:  Georges Feller
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-01-17

10.  Molecular basis of the STIL coiled coil oligomerization explains its requirement for de-novo formation of centrosomes in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Ahuvit David; Hadar Amartely; Noa Rabinowicz; Mai Shamir; Assaf Friedler; Shai Izraeli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.