Literature DB >> 18794317

Radiation dose descriptors: BERT, COD, DAP, and other strange creatures.

Edward L Nickoloff1, Zheng Feng Lu, Ajoy K Dutta, James C So.   

Abstract

Over the years, a number of terms have been used to describe radiation dose. Eight common radiation dose descriptors include background equivalent radiation time (BERT), critical organ dose (COD), surface absorbed dose (SAD), dose area product (DAP), diagnostic acceptable reference level (DARLing), effective dose (ED), fetal absorbed dose (FAD), and total imparted energy (TIE). BERT is compared to the annual natural background radiation (about 3 mSv per year) and is easily understandable for the general public. COD refers to the radiation dose delivered to an individual critical organ. SAD is the radiation dose delivered at the skin surface. DAP is a product of the irradiated surface area multiplied by the radiation dose at the surface. DARLing is usually the radiation level that encompasses 75% (the third quartile) of the data derived from a nationwide or regional survey. DARLings are meant for voluntary guidance. Consistently higher patient doses should be investigated for possible equipment deficiencies or suboptimal protocols. ED is obtained by multiplying the radiation dose delivered to each organ by its weighting factor and then by adding those values to get the sum. It can be used to assess the risk of radiation-induced cancers and serious hereditary effects to future generations, regardless of the procedure being performed, and is the most useful radiation dose descriptor. FAD is the radiation dose delivered to the fetus, and TIE is the sum of the energy imparted to all irradiated tissue. Each of these descriptors is intended to relate radiation dose ultimately to potential biologic effects. To avoid confusion, the key is to avoid using the terms interchangeably. It is important to understand each of the radiation dose descriptors and their derivation in order to correctly evaluate radiation dose and to consult with patients concerned about the risks of radiation. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18794317     DOI: 10.1148/rg.285075748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose measurements in coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Image Quality of Low-Dose Cerebral Angiography and Effectiveness of Clinical Implementation on Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  J Choi; B Kim; Y Choi; N Y Shin; J Jang; H S Choi; S L Jung; K J Ahn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Ibrahim I Suliman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Relationships Between Radiation Exposure Dose, Time, and Projection in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Janina Wilmskoetter; Sameer Tipnis; Janet Horn; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Walter Huda
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Radiation dose monitoring in pediatric fluoroscopy: comparison of fluoroscopy time and dose-area product thresholds for identifying high-exposure cases.

Authors:  Matthew S Lazarus; Benjamin H Taragin; William Malouf; Terry L Levin; Eduardo Nororis; Alan H Schoenfeld; Amichai J Erdfarb
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Patient radiation dose in diagnostic and interventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms: experience at a single center.

Authors:  Chang Woo Chun; Bum-Soo Kim; Cheol Hyoun Lee; Yon Kwon Ihn; Yong-Sam Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Patient-Based Dose Audit for Common Radiographic Examinations With Digital Radiology Systems: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Khalid M Alshamrani; Abdulkader A Alkenawi; Bushra N Alghamdi; Rawan H Honain; Haneen A Alshehri; Marwah O Alshatiri; Noor Mail; Ahmed Subahi; Shaza S Alsharif; Abdulaziz A Qurashi; Shrooq Aldahery; Reham Kaifi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 8.  Patient Dose Management: Focus on Practical Actions.

Authors:  Michael Yong Park; Seung Eun Jung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Correlation between effective dose and radiological risk: general concepts.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Costa; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Denise Yanikian Nersissian; Camila Souza Melo
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun

10.  Optimizing imaging quality and radiation dose by the age-dependent setting of tube voltage in pediatric chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Wen-Ya Liu; Xiao-Ye He; Xiao-Shan Zhou; Qun-Li Zeng; Bai-Yan Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.