J Choi1, B Kim2, Y Choi3, N Y Shin3, J Jang3, H S Choi3, S L Jung3, K J Ahn3. 1. From the Department of Radiology (J.C.), St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology (B.K., Y.C., N.Y.S., J.J., H.S.C., S.L.J., K.J.A.), Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. bumrad@catholic.ac.kr. 3. Department of Radiology (B.K., Y.C., N.Y.S., J.J., H.S.C., S.L.J., K.J.A.), Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Awareness of the potential for exposure to high doses of radiation from interventional radiologic procedures has increased. The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and dose reduction of low-dose cerebral angiography during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1137 prospectively collected patients between January 2012 and June 2014 was performed. Beginning in April 2013, a dose-reduction strategy was implemented. Subjective image-quality assessment of 506 standard and 540 low-dose cerebral angiography images was performed by 2 neuroradiologists using a 5-point scale and was tested using noninferiority statistics. Radiation dose-area product and air kerma of 1046 diagnostic and 317 therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms were analyzed and compared between groups before (group 1) and after (group 2) clinical implementation of a dose-reduction strategy. RESULTS: The image quality of the low-dose cerebral angiography was not inferior on the basis of results from the 2 readers. For diagnostic cerebral angiography, the mean dose-area product and air kerma were 140.8 Gy×cm2 and 1.0 Gy, respectively, in group 1 and 82.0 Gy×cm2 and 0.6 Gy in group 2 (P < .001, P < .001). For the neurointerventional procedure, the mean dose-area product and air kerma were 246.0 Gy×cm2 and 3.7 Gy, respectively, in group 1 and 169.8 Gy×cm2 and 3.3 Gy in group 2 (P < .001, P = .291). CONCLUSIONS: With low-dose cerebral angiography, image quality was maintained, and implementation of dose-reduction strategies reduced radiation doses in patients undergoing diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Awareness of the potential for exposure to high doses of radiation from interventional radiologic procedures has increased. The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and dose reduction of low-dose cerebral angiography during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1137 prospectively collected patients between January 2012 and June 2014 was performed. Beginning in April 2013, a dose-reduction strategy was implemented. Subjective image-quality assessment of 506 standard and 540 low-dose cerebral angiography images was performed by 2 neuroradiologists using a 5-point scale and was tested using noninferiority statistics. Radiation dose-area product and air kerma of 1046 diagnostic and 317 therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms were analyzed and compared between groups before (group 1) and after (group 2) clinical implementation of a dose-reduction strategy. RESULTS: The image quality of the low-dose cerebral angiography was not inferior on the basis of results from the 2 readers. For diagnostic cerebral angiography, the mean dose-area product and air kerma were 140.8 Gy×cm2 and 1.0 Gy, respectively, in group 1 and 82.0 Gy×cm2 and 0.6 Gy in group 2 (P < .001, P < .001). For the neurointerventional procedure, the mean dose-area product and air kerma were 246.0 Gy×cm2 and 3.7 Gy, respectively, in group 1 and 169.8 Gy×cm2 and 3.3 Gy in group 2 (P < .001, P = .291). CONCLUSIONS: With low-dose cerebral angiography, image quality was maintained, and implementation of dose-reduction strategies reduced radiation doses in patients undergoing diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms.
Authors: A Aroua; H Rickli; J-C Stauffer; P Schnyder; P R Trueb; J-F Valley; P Vock; F R Verdun Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Monica S Pearl; Collin Torok; Zinovy Katz; Steven A Messina; Jordi Blasco; Rafael J Tamargo; Judy Huang; Richard Leigh; Steven Zeiler; Martin Radvany; Tina Ehtiati; Philippe Gailloud Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Yon Kwon Ihn; Bum-Soo Kim; Jun Soo Byun; Sang Hyun Suh; Yoo Dong Won; Deok Hee Lee; Byung Moon Kim; Young Soo Kim; Pyong Jeon; Chang-Woo Ryu; Sang-Il Suh; Dae Seob Choi; See Sung Choi; Jin Wook Choi; Hyuk Won Chang; Jae-Wook Lee; Sang Heum Kim; Young Jun Lee; Shang Hun Shin; Soo Mee Lim; Woong Yoon; Hae Woong Jeong; Moon Hee Han Journal: Neurointervention Date: 2016-09-03
Authors: Marco Brambilla; Giuseppe Marano; Marco Dominietto; Antonio Raffaele Cotroneo; Alessandro Carriero Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: E Vano; J M Fernandez; R M Sanchez; D Martinez; L Lopez Ibor; A Gil; C Serna-Candel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.825