Literature DB >> 18791773

Femoral osteolysis around the unrevised stem during isolated acetabular revision.

Byung-Woo Min1, Kwang-Soon Song, Chul-Hyun Cho, Ki-Cheor Bae, Kyung-Jae Lee.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Many surgeons treat progressive femoral osteolysis in association with a well-fixed stem with bone grafting but in uncontained proximal defects the graft could get into the joint, raising a question regarding whether the osteolysis can be treated by simple débridement without bone grafting. We investigated whether the curetted proximal osteolysis around an unrevised femoral component progressed in size and whether this lesion would have a deleterious effect on fixation of the femoral component in patients with isolated acetabular revision. We prospectively followed 21 patients (24 hips) who underwent acetabular revision and curetting of femoral osteolysis. The minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 4.3 years; range, 3-7.4 years). By the latest followup, no hips had major progression of the osteolytic defect through the followup period and none had any new osteolytic lesions. All hips were judged stable and to have well-fixed acetabular cups and femoral stems. Provided a femoral component is bone ingrown with osseointegration sufficient to provide long-term stability, the osteolytic defect is in the proximal aspect of the femur, and the defect is uncontained, simple curettage may preserve femoral implant stability and may prevent progression of osteolysis to another Gruen zone for at least 3 to 7 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791773      PMCID: PMC2674156          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0499-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. Recipient of the 1999 HAP Paul Award.

Authors:  O K Muratoglu; C R Bragdon; D O O'Connor; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Michel J Le Duff; Frederick J Dorey; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles.

Authors:  H G Willert; H Bertram; G H Buchhorn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  J Livermore; D Ilstrup; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study.

Authors:  P Massin; L Schmidt; C A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

9.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating. A five-year study.

Authors:  C A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years.

Authors:  Vijay C Bose; Kanniyan Kalaivanan; Mithun Manohar; Ashok Kumar; Shantanu Patil; P Suryanarayan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.251

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.