Literature DB >> 19492982

Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.

Bryce Borchers1, Marshall Brown, Brian McLellan, Airat Bekmetjev, Nathan L Tintle.   

Abstract

The genome-wide association (GWA) study is an increasingly popular way to attempt to identify the causal variants in human disease. Duplicate genotyping (or re-genotyping) a portion of the samples in a GWA study is common, though it is typical for these data to be ignored in subsequent tests of genetic association. We demonstrate a method for including duplicate genotype data in linear trend tests of genetic association which yields increased power. We also consider the cost-effectiveness of collecting duplicate genotype data and find that when the relative cost of genotyping to phenotyping and sample acquisition costs is less than or equal to the genotyping error rate it is more powerful to duplicate genotype the entire sample instead of spending the same money to increase the sample size. Duplicate genotyping is particularly cost-effective when SNP minor allele frequencies are low. Practical advice for the implementation of duplicate genotyping is provided. Free software is provided to compute asymptotic and permutation based tests of association using duplicate genotype data as well as to aid in the duplicate genotyping design decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19492982      PMCID: PMC2861316          DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  23 in total

1.  Allowing for genotyping error in analysis of unmatched case-control studies.

Authors:  K M Rice; P Holmans
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?

Authors:  Sun Jung Kang; Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions.

Authors:  François Pompanon; Aurélie Bonin; Eva Bellemain; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.

Authors:  A Bonin; E Bellemain; P Bronken Eidesen; F Pompanon; C Brochmann; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Using duplicate genotyped data in genetic analyses: testing association and estimating error rates.

Authors:  Nathan L Tintle; Derek Gordon; Francis J McMahon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-02-05

Review 6.  Successful design and conduct of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.

Authors:  Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Helmut Küchenhoff; Guido Fischer; Norman Klopp; Melanie Kolz; Harald Grallert; Caren Vollmert; Stefanie Wagner; Cornelia Huth; Julia Müller; Martina Müller; Steven C Hunt; Annette Peters; Bernhard Paulweber; H-Erich Wichmann; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Illig
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.

Authors:  Nathan Tintle; Derek Gordon; Dirk Van Bruggen; Stephen Finch
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Reproducibility of Genotypes as Measured by the Affymetrix GeneChip® 100K Human Mapping Array Set.

Authors:  Brooke L Fridley; Stephen T Turner; Arlene Chapman; Andrei Rodin; Eric Boerwinkle; Kent Bailey
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Characteristics of replicated single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes from COGA: Affymetrix and Center for Inherited Disease Research.

Authors:  Nathan L Tintle; Kwangmi Ahn; Nancy Role Mendell; Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Scott Powers; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.

Authors:  Lin Hou; Ning Sun; Shrikant Mane; Fred Sayward; Nallakkandi Rajeevan; Kei-Hoi Cheung; Kelly Cho; Saiju Pyarajan; Mihaela Aslan; Perry Miller; Philip D Harvey; J Michael Gaziano; John Concato; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  The cost-effectiveness of reclassification sampling for prevalence estimation.

Authors:  Airat Bekmetjev; Dirk VanBruggen; Brian McLellan; Benjamin DeWinkle; Eric Lunderberg; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Morgan Mayer-Jochimsen; Shannon Fast; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.