Literature DB >> 1427888

Systematic detection of errors in genetic linkage data.

S E Lincoln1, E S Lander.   

Abstract

Construction of dense genetic linkage maps is hampered, in practice, by the occurrence of laboratory typing errors. Even relatively low error rates cause substantial map expansion and interfere with the determination of correct genetic order. Here, we describe a systematic method for overcoming these difficulties, based on incorporating the possibility of error into the usual likelihood model for linkage analysis. Using this approach, it is possible to construct genetic maps allowing for error and to identify the typings most likely to be in error. The method has been implemented for F2 intercrosses between two inbred strains, a situation relevant to the construction of genetic maps in experimental organisms. Tests involving both simulated and real data are presented, showing that the method detects the vast majority of errors.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1427888     DOI: 10.1016/s0888-7543(05)80158-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  127 in total

1.  Selective mapping: a strategy for optimizing the construction of high-density linkage maps.

Authors:  T J Vision; D G Brown; D B Shmoys; R T Durrett; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping.

Authors:  K R Ewen; M Bahlo; S A Treloar; D F Levinson; B Mowry; J W Barlow; S J Foote
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A tale of two genotypes: consistency between two high-throughput genotyping centers.

Authors:  Daniel E Weeks; Yvette P Conley; Robert E Ferrell; Tammy S Mah; Michael B Gorin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping.

Authors:  S Sen; G A Churchill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures.

Authors:  J M Akey; K Zhang; M Xiong; P Doris; L Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  Adele A Mitchell; David J Cutler; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting.

Authors:  Lutz Froenicke; Lorinda K Anderson; Johannes Wienberg; Terry Ashley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Selective genotyping with epistasis can be utilized for a major quantitative trait locus mapping in hypertension in rats.

Authors:  Y Ohno; H Tanase; T Nabika; K Otsuka; T Sasaki; T Suzawa; T Morii; Y Yamori; T Saruta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.