Literature DB >> 18787813

The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.

M Cukic1, A Kalauzi, T Ilic, M Miskovic, M Ljubisavljevic.   

Abstract

We have investigated the effects of changing the coil-to-skull distance on the motor-evoked responses (MEP) induced with two different magnetic stimulator coils (80 mm round and figure-of-eight coil) at rest and during voluntary muscle contraction. The changes in MEP latency, amplitude and silent period (SP) duration induced by stimulation directly upon the skull, and 1 cm away from the skull were analyzed by computing the probability density distribution (PDD) for the responses obtained from all subjects. This measure corresponds to the finite probability that the event occurs within a given area. Overall, the results were consistent with a distance-induced decrease in magnetic field strength. However, the increase in coil-to-skull distance induced a higher probability of longer latencies in active muscle when stimulating with either coil. Also, stimulating at a distance with the figure-of-eight coil increased the probability of a longer SP duration. The stimulation strength at the two distances was comparable because it was set based on the motor threshold obtained for each distance. Therefore, our results are not entirely compatible with the established exponential drop in magnetic field with increasing distance. Rather, they suggest that a more complex set of interactions occurs in the cortex. The results imply that distinct patterns of cortical network activation may exist related to the distance-induced alterations when the coil is moved away from the skull. Further studies are required to elucidate the precise nature of the distance-related interactions of the magnetic field with the cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787813     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1552-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Direct recordings of descending volleys after transcranial magnetic and electric motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F A Kozel; Z Nahas; C deBrux; M Molloy; J P Lorberbaum; D Bohning; S C Risch; M S George
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.198

Review 3.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations.

Authors:  L G Cohen; B J Roth; J Nilsson; N Dang; M Panizza; S Bandinelli; W Friauf; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04

5.  A reconstruction of the conductive phenomena elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue.

Authors:  Nicola Toschi; Tobias Welt; Maria Guerrisi; Martin E Keck
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-02

Review 7.  Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; M Stewart; G J Quirk; J L Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D Burke; R Hicks; S C Gandevia; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Christopher D Chambers; Ian C Gould; Therese English; Elizabeth McNaught; Odette McDonald; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using simultaneous repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (rTMS/fNIRS) to measure brain activation and connectivity.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Fenghua Tian; Sameer Dhamne; Paul E Croarkin; Shawn M McClintock; Alan Elliott; Kimberly S Mapes; Mustafa M Husain; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Direct-current-dependent shift of theta-burst-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alkomiet Hasan; Masashi Hamada; Michael A Nitsche; Diane Ruge; Joseph M Galea; Thomas Wobrock; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Determining the Optimal Number of Stimuli per Cranial Site during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Mapping.

Authors:  Rocco Cavaleri; Siobhan M Schabrun; Lucy S Chipchase
Journal:  Neurosci J       Date:  2017-02-26

Review 4.  Non-invasive brain stimulation as therapy: systematic review and recommendations with a focus on the treatment of Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Katherine Dyke; Georgina Jackson; Stephen Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.