Literature DB >> 7511521

Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions.

A Pascual-Leone1, L G Cohen, J P Brasil-Neto, M Hallett.   

Abstract

Non-invasive mapping of human motor cortex by stimulating different scalp positions with a magnetic coil held at a constant orientation allows differentiation of proximal and distal arm muscles. This study describes a technique for more precise mapping of closely represented muscles using different orientations of a coil that delivers nearly monopolar current pulses. EMG was recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) of 9 normal volunteers. Stimuli were delivered from a Dantec stimulator through an 8-shaped coil. The center of the coil was kept flat on the scalp on a given position, and the coil rotated at different angles. The amplitudes of the motor evoked potentials were used for calculation of optimal current directions in the brain for activation of each muscle in each position. The optimal current direction for FCR activation pointed antero-medially. ADM, FDI and APB mapped progressively more antero-laterally. The relationship between current directions was constant across subjects and did not change in different scalp positions. This technique improves the spatial resolution of non-invasive cortical mapping and may express the differences in orientations of interneuronal nets in the precentral gyrus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7511521     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90090-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  19 in total

1.  The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Scott C Livingston; Howard P Goodkin; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activity during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Debora Brignani; Paolo Manganotti; Paolo M Rossini; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Magnetic stimulation of one-dimensional neuronal cultures.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Elisha Moses
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.

Authors:  M Cukic; A Kalauzi; T Ilic; M Miskovic; M Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates.

Authors:  Sein Schmidt; Rouven Bathe-Peters; Robert Fleischmann; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Intra- and intersubject reliability of abductor pollicis brevis muscle motor map characteristics with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Corneal; Andrew J Butler; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Jennifer M Perez; Jared C Horvath; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: the impact of white matter fiber orientation and skull-to-cortex distance.

Authors:  Tal Herbsman; Lauren Forster; Christine Molnar; Robert Dougherty; Doug Christie; Jejo Koola; Dave Ramsey; Paul S Morgan; Daryl E Bohning; Mark S George; Ziad Nahas
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.